Demographics details for Girdletree, MD vs Winona, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Girdletree, MD vs Winona, MS.

Data Girdletree Winona
Population 122 4,159
Median Age 57.4 years 33.7 years
Median Income $129,167 $26,250
Married Families 50.0% 21.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 24%
Unemployment Rate Data is updating 3.6

Population Comparison: Girdletree vs Winona

  • The population in Winona is higher at 4,159, compared to 122 in Girdletree.
  • Residents in Girdletree have a higher median age of 57.4 years compared to 33.7 years in Winona.
  • Girdletree has a higher median income of $129,167 compared to $26,250 in Winona.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Girdletree at 50.0% compared to 21.0% in Winona.
  • The poverty level is higher in Winona at 24%, compared to 0% in Girdletree.
  • Winona has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 0.0% in Girdletree.

Demographics

Demographics Girdletree vs Winona provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Girdletree Winona
Black Data is updating 62
White 89 38
Asian 11 Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating Data is updating
Two or More Races Data is updating Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Girdletree vs Winona

  • In Winona, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 62% compared to 0% in Girdletree.
  • Girdletree has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 38% in Winona.
  • The Asian population is larger in Girdletree at 11% compared to 0% in Winona.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Girdletree and Winona at 0%.
  • Both Girdletree and Winona have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 0%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Girdletree and Winona at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Girdletree Winona
Mental Health Not Good 16.7% 19.3%
Physical Health Not Good 10.6% 15.0%
Depression 20.8% 22.3%
Smoking 18.7% 24.8%
Binge Drinking 18.8% 11.8%
Obesity 39.6% 46.4%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 25.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Girdletree vs Winona

  • In Winona, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 16.7% in Girdletree.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Winona at 22.3% versus 20.8% in Girdletree.
  • Winona has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 18.7% in Girdletree.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Girdletree at 18.8% compared to 11.8% in Winona.
  • Winona has higher obesity rates at 46.4% compared to 39.6% in Girdletree.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Winona at 25.0% compared to 8.0% in Girdletree.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Girdletree Winona
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 2.1% (87)
High School Diploma 44.3% (54) 11.4% (473)
Less than High School 19.7% (24) 28.5% (1,186)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 5.7% (7) 9.3% (388)

Education Levels Comparison: Girdletree vs Winona

  • In Winona, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Girdletree.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Girdletree hold a high school diploma at 44.3% compared to 11.4% in Winona.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Winona at 28.5%, compared to 19.7% in Girdletree.
  • In Winona, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.3% compared to 5.7% in Girdletree.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.