Demographics details for Girdletree, MD vs Waterproof, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Girdletree, MD vs Waterproof, LA.
| Data | Girdletree | Waterproof |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 122 | 499 |
| Median Age | 57.4 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $129,167 | $21,953 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 9.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 30% |
| Unemployment Rate | Data is updating | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Girdletree vs Waterproof
- The population in Waterproof is higher at 499, compared to 122 in Girdletree.
- Residents in Girdletree have a higher median age of 57.4 years compared to 37.0 years in Waterproof.
- Girdletree has a higher median income of $129,167 compared to $21,953 in Waterproof.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Girdletree at 50.0% compared to 9.0% in Waterproof.
- The poverty level is higher in Waterproof at 30%, compared to 0% in Girdletree.
- Waterproof has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 0.0% in Girdletree.
Demographics
Demographics Girdletree vs Waterproof provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Girdletree | Waterproof |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 103 |
| White | 89 | -12 |
| Asian | 11 | 7 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Girdletree vs Waterproof
- In Waterproof, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 103% compared to 0% in Girdletree.
- Girdletree has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to -12% in Waterproof.
- The Asian population is larger in Girdletree at 11% compared to 7% in Waterproof.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Girdletree and Waterproof at 0%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Waterproof at 2%, compared to 0% in Girdletree.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Girdletree and Waterproof at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Girdletree | Waterproof |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 24.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 20.0% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 25.1% |
| Smoking | 18.7% | 33.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 11.8% |
| Obesity | 39.6% | 53.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Girdletree vs Waterproof
- In Waterproof, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 24.5% compared to 16.7% in Girdletree.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Waterproof at 25.1% versus 20.8% in Girdletree.
- Waterproof has a higher smoking rate at 33.7% compared to 18.7% in Girdletree.
- Binge drinking is more common in Girdletree at 18.8% compared to 11.8% in Waterproof.
- Waterproof has higher obesity rates at 53.1% compared to 39.6% in Girdletree.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Waterproof at 22.0% compared to 8.0% in Girdletree.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Girdletree | Waterproof |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 44.3% (54) | 27.7% (138) |
| Less than High School | 19.7% (24) | 10.6% (53) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.7% (7) | 12.8% (64) |
Education Levels Comparison: Girdletree vs Waterproof
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Girdletree and Waterproof at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Girdletree hold a high school diploma at 44.3% compared to 27.7% in Waterproof.
- More residents in Girdletree have less than a high school education at 19.7% compared to 10.6% in Waterproof.
- In Waterproof, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.8% compared to 5.7% in Girdletree.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.