Demographics details for Girdletree, MD vs Panacea, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Girdletree, MD vs Panacea, FL.
| Data | Girdletree | Panacea |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 122 | 1,152 |
| Median Age | 57.4 years | 46.7 years |
| Median Income | $129,167 | $36,250 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | Data is updating | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Girdletree vs Panacea
- The population in Panacea is higher at 1,152, compared to 122 in Girdletree.
- Residents in Girdletree have a higher median age of 57.4 years compared to 46.7 years in Panacea.
- Girdletree has a higher median income of $129,167 compared to $36,250 in Panacea.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Girdletree at 50.0% compared to 30.0% in Panacea.
- The poverty level is higher in Panacea at 10%, compared to 0% in Girdletree.
- Panacea has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 0.0% in Girdletree.
Demographics
Demographics Girdletree vs Panacea provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Girdletree | Panacea |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 89 | 99 |
| Asian | 11 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Girdletree vs Panacea
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Girdletree and Panacea at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Panacea at 99% compared to 89% in Girdletree.
- The Asian population is larger in Girdletree at 11% compared to 0% in Panacea.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Girdletree and Panacea at 0%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Panacea at 1%, compared to 0% in Girdletree.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Girdletree and Panacea at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Girdletree | Panacea |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 18.7% | 23.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 39.6% | 32.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 31.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Girdletree vs Panacea
- In Panacea, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.7% in Girdletree.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Panacea at 22.3% versus 20.8% in Girdletree.
- Panacea has a higher smoking rate at 23.5% compared to 18.7% in Girdletree.
- Binge drinking is more common in Girdletree at 18.8% compared to 17.4% in Panacea.
- Obesity rates are higher in Girdletree at 39.6% compared to 32.3% in Panacea.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Panacea at 31.0% compared to 8.0% in Girdletree.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Girdletree | Panacea |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 4.1% (47) |
| High School Diploma | 44.3% (54) | 32.5% (374) |
| Less than High School | 19.7% (24) | 55.4% (638) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.7% (7) | 11.9% (137) |
Education Levels Comparison: Girdletree vs Panacea
- In Panacea, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.1% compared to 0.0% in Girdletree.
- A higher percentage of residents in Girdletree hold a high school diploma at 44.3% compared to 32.5% in Panacea.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Panacea at 55.4%, compared to 19.7% in Girdletree.
- In Panacea, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.9% compared to 5.7% in Girdletree.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.