Demographics details for Girdletree, MD vs Crawford, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Girdletree, MD vs Crawford, NE.
| Data | Girdletree | Crawford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 122 | 838 |
| Median Age | 57.4 years | 52.1 years |
| Median Income | $129,167 | $54,167 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | Data is updating | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Girdletree vs Crawford
- The population in Crawford is higher at 838, compared to 122 in Girdletree.
- Residents in Girdletree have a higher median age of 57.4 years compared to 52.1 years in Crawford.
- Girdletree has a higher median income of $129,167 compared to $54,167 in Crawford.
- In Crawford, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 50.0% in Girdletree.
- The poverty level is higher in Crawford at 10%, compared to 0% in Girdletree.
- Crawford has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 0.0% in Girdletree.
Demographics
Demographics Girdletree vs Crawford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Girdletree | Crawford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 89 | 76 |
| Asian | 11 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 15 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 6 |
Demographics Comparison: Girdletree vs Crawford
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Girdletree and Crawford at 0%.
- Girdletree has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 76% in Crawford.
- The Asian population is larger in Girdletree at 11% compared to 0% in Crawford.
- Crawford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 0% in Girdletree.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Crawford at 3%, compared to 0% in Girdletree.
- In Crawford, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 6%, compared to 0% in Girdletree.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Girdletree | Crawford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 13.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 18.9% |
| Smoking | 18.7% | 15.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 20.0% |
| Obesity | 39.6% | 40.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Girdletree vs Crawford
- More residents in Girdletree report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 13.8% in Crawford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Girdletree at 20.8% compared to 18.9% in Crawford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Girdletree at 18.7% compared to 15.7% in Crawford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Crawford at 20.0% compared to 18.8% in Girdletree.
- Crawford has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 39.6% in Girdletree.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Crawford at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Girdletree.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Girdletree | Crawford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.6% (5) |
| High School Diploma | 44.3% (54) | 30.2% (253) |
| Less than High School | 19.7% (24) | 6.0% (50) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.7% (7) | 17.1% (143) |
Education Levels Comparison: Girdletree vs Crawford
- In Crawford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Girdletree.
- A higher percentage of residents in Girdletree hold a high school diploma at 44.3% compared to 30.2% in Crawford.
- More residents in Girdletree have less than a high school education at 19.7% compared to 6.0% in Crawford.
- In Crawford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 5.7% in Girdletree.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.