Demographics details for Gillette, NJ vs Bolivar, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gillette, NJ vs Bolivar, TN.
Data | Gillette | Bolivar |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,251 | 5,194 |
Median Age | 41.0 years | 39.9 years |
Median Income | $145,000 | $36,348 |
Married Families | 62.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 2% | 22% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Gillette vs Bolivar
- The population in Bolivar is higher at 5,194, compared to 3,251 in Gillette.
- Residents in Gillette have a higher median age of 41.0 years compared to 39.9 years in Bolivar.
- Gillette has a higher median income of $145,000 compared to $36,348 in Bolivar.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gillette at 62.0% compared to 31.0% in Bolivar.
- The poverty level is higher in Bolivar at 22%, compared to 2% in Gillette.
- Bolivar has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.0% in Gillette.
Demographics
Demographics Gillette vs Bolivar provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Gillette | Bolivar |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 62 |
White | 90 | 30 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Gillette vs Bolivar
- In Bolivar, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 62% compared to 1% in Gillette.
- Gillette has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 30% in Bolivar.
- The Asian population is larger in Gillette at 4% compared to 0% in Bolivar.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gillette at 2% compared to 1% in Bolivar.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bolivar at 5%, compared to 3% in Gillette.
- In Bolivar, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Gillette.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Gillette | Bolivar |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 21.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 15.8% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 25.2% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 26.1% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 11.7% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 42.7% |
Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gillette vs Bolivar
- In Bolivar, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bolivar at 25.2% versus 0.0% in Gillette.
- Bolivar has a higher smoking rate at 26.1% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bolivar at 11.7% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- Bolivar has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bolivar at 27.0% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Gillette | Bolivar |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 23.8% (1,238) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 15.1% (786) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 7.7% (398) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gillette vs Bolivar
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Gillette and Bolivar at 0.0%.
- In Bolivar, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.8% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bolivar at 15.1%, compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- In Bolivar, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.7% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.