Demographics details for Gill, CO vs Woodstock, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Gill, CO vs Woodstock, IL.

Data Gill Woodstock
Population 102 25,665
Median Age 37.0 years 36.3 years
Median Income $60,000 $82,287
Married Families 30.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 12% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.0 5.7

Population Comparison: Gill vs Woodstock

  • The population in Woodstock is higher at 25,665, compared to 102 in Gill.
  • Residents in Gill have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 36.3 years in Woodstock.
  • Woodstock has a higher median income of $82,287, compared to $60,000 in Gill.
  • In Woodstock, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 30.0% in Gill.
  • Gill has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Woodstock.
  • Woodstock has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 3.0% in Gill.

Demographics

Demographics Gill vs Woodstock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Gill Woodstock
Black Data is updating 3
White 100 59
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic Data is updating 23
Two or More Races Data is updating 13
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Gill vs Woodstock

  • In Woodstock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Gill.
  • Gill has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 59% in Woodstock.
  • In Woodstock, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Gill.
  • Woodstock has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 0% in Gill.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodstock at 13%, compared to 0% in Gill.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gill and Woodstock at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Gill Woodstock
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.3%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 10.7%
Depression Data is updating% 20.2%
Smoking Data is updating% 15.2%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 17.7%
Obesity Data is updating% 32.4%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Gill vs Woodstock

  • In Woodstock, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Woodstock at 20.2% versus 0.0% in Gill.
  • Woodstock has a higher smoking rate at 15.2% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Woodstock at 17.7% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
  • Woodstock has higher obesity rates at 32.4% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woodstock at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Gill.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Gill Woodstock
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.9% (237)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 15.8% (4,047)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 12.9% (3,314)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 21.0% (5,381)

Education Levels Comparison: Gill vs Woodstock

  • In Woodstock, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
  • In Woodstock, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.8% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodstock at 12.9%, compared to 0.0% in Gill.
  • In Woodstock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.0% compared to 0.0% in Gill.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.