Demographics details for Gill, CO vs Sedona, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gill, CO vs Sedona, AZ.
| Data | Gill | Sedona |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 102 | 9,790 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 58.7 years |
| Median Income | $60,000 | $62,901 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Gill vs Sedona
- The population in Sedona is higher at 9,790, compared to 102 in Gill.
- The median age in Sedona is higher at 58.7 years, compared to 37.0 years in Gill.
- Sedona has a higher median income of $62,901, compared to $60,000 in Gill.
- In Sedona, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 30.0% in Gill.
- Gill has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Sedona.
- Sedona has a higher unemployment rate at 3.3% compared to 3.0% in Gill.
Demographics
Demographics Gill vs Sedona provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gill | Sedona |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 100 | 73 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 19 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gill vs Sedona
- In Sedona, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Gill.
- Gill has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 73% in Sedona.
- In Sedona, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Gill.
- Sedona has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 0% in Gill.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sedona at 4%, compared to 0% in Gill.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gill and Sedona at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gill | Sedona |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 15.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 9.1% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 12.0% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 24.5% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gill vs Sedona
- In Sedona, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sedona at 19.7% versus 0.0% in Gill.
- Sedona has a higher smoking rate at 12.0% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sedona at 17.3% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
- Sedona has higher obesity rates at 24.5% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sedona at 12.0% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gill | Sedona |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.1% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 12.3% (1,206) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 8.4% (827) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 44.7% (4,375) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gill vs Sedona
- In Sedona, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
- In Sedona, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.3% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sedona at 8.4%, compared to 0.0% in Gill.
- In Sedona, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.7% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.