Demographics details for Gill, CO vs Eureka, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gill, CO vs Eureka, MO.
| Data | Gill | Eureka |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 102 | 12,729 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 37.9 years |
| Median Income | $60,000 | $104,697 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Gill vs Eureka
- The population in Eureka is higher at 12,729, compared to 102 in Gill.
- The median age in Eureka is higher at 37.9 years, compared to 37.0 years in Gill.
- Eureka has a higher median income of $104,697, compared to $60,000 in Gill.
- In Eureka, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 30.0% in Gill.
- Gill has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Eureka.
- Eureka has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 3.0% in Gill.
Demographics
Demographics Gill vs Eureka provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gill | Eureka |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 100 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 2 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gill vs Eureka
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Gill and Eureka at 0%.
- Gill has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 88% in Eureka.
- In Eureka, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Gill.
- Eureka has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Gill.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Eureka at 8%, compared to 0% in Gill.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gill and Eureka at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gill | Eureka |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 8.7% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 14.1% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 21.9% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 30.0% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gill vs Eureka
- In Eureka, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.2% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Eureka at 22.8% versus 0.0% in Gill.
- Eureka has a higher smoking rate at 14.1% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Eureka at 21.9% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
- Eureka has higher obesity rates at 30.0% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Eureka at 7.0% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gill | Eureka |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 10.5% (1,337) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 3.2% (405) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 30.1% (3,835) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gill vs Eureka
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Gill and Eureka at 0.0%.
- In Eureka, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.5% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Eureka at 3.2%, compared to 0.0% in Gill.
- In Eureka, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.