Demographics details for Gilford, NH vs Russellville, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Gilford, NH vs Russellville, KY.

Data Gilford Russellville
Population 7,194 7,282
Median Age 47.5 years 35.9 years
Median Income $75,964 $45,484
Married Families 0.6% 38.0%
Poverty Level 6% 15%
Unemployment Rate 2.2 4.0

Population Comparison: Gilford vs Russellville

  • The population in Russellville is higher at 7,282, compared to 7,194 in Gilford.
  • Residents in Gilford have a higher median age of 47.5 years compared to 35.9 years in Russellville.
  • Gilford has a higher median income of $75,964 compared to $45,484 in Russellville.
  • In Russellville, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 0.6% in Gilford.
  • The poverty level is higher in Russellville at 15%, compared to 6% in Gilford.
  • Russellville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 2.2% in Gilford.

Demographics

Demographics Gilford vs Russellville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Gilford Russellville
Black 0.5 14
White 96.2 79
Asian 0.7 1
Hispanic 1.6 4
Two or More Races 1.0 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Gilford vs Russellville

  • In Russellville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 0.5% in Gilford.
  • Gilford has a higher percentage of White residents at 96.2% compared to 79% in Russellville.
  • In Russellville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0.7% in Gilford.
  • Russellville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 1.6% in Gilford.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Russellville at 2%, compared to 1.0% in Gilford.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gilford and Russellville at 0.0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Gilford Russellville
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 20.3%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.3%
Depression Data is updating% 28.3%
Smoking Data is updating% 24.1%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 14.2%
Obesity Data is updating% 43.0%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 21.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Gilford vs Russellville

  • In Russellville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Russellville at 28.3% versus 0.0% in Gilford.
  • Russellville has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Russellville at 14.2% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
  • Russellville has higher obesity rates at 43.0% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Russellville at 21.0% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Gilford Russellville
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.1% (83)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 24.4% (1,780)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 12.4% (903)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 9.1% (665)

Education Levels Comparison: Gilford vs Russellville

  • In Russellville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
  • In Russellville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.4% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Russellville at 12.4%, compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
  • In Russellville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.1% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.