Demographics details for Gilford, NH vs Clayton, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gilford, NH vs Clayton, OH.
| Data | Gilford | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,194 | 13,235 |
| Median Age | 47.5 years | 46.0 years |
| Median Income | $75,964 | $89,282 |
| Married Families | 0.6% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Gilford vs Clayton
- The population in Clayton is higher at 13,235, compared to 7,194 in Gilford.
- Residents in Gilford have a higher median age of 47.5 years compared to 46.0 years in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $89,282, compared to $75,964 in Gilford.
- In Clayton, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 0.6% in Gilford.
- The poverty level is higher in Clayton at 10%, compared to 6% in Gilford.
- Clayton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.2% in Gilford.
Demographics
Demographics Gilford vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gilford | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 0.5 | 30 |
| White | 96.2 | 61 |
| Asian | 0.7 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 1.6 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 1.0 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gilford vs Clayton
- In Clayton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 30% compared to 0.5% in Gilford.
- Gilford has a higher percentage of White residents at 96.2% compared to 61% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0.7% in Gilford.
- Clayton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 1.6% in Gilford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clayton at 5%, compared to 1.0% in Gilford.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gilford and Clayton at 0.0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gilford | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 10.3% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 15.3% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gilford vs Clayton
- In Clayton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clayton at 24.4% versus 0.0% in Gilford.
- Clayton has a higher smoking rate at 15.3% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clayton at 18.9% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Clayton has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clayton at 13.0% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gilford | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.2% (30) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 17.9% (2,371) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 5.6% (746) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 26.3% (3,484) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gilford vs Clayton
- In Clayton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- In Clayton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.9% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clayton at 5.6%, compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- In Clayton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.