Demographics details for Gilford, NH vs Chesnee, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gilford, NH vs Chesnee, SC.
| Data | Gilford | Chesnee |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,194 | 878 |
| Median Age | 47.5 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $75,964 | $42,727 |
| Married Families | 0.6% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Gilford vs Chesnee
- In Gilford, the population is higher at 7,194, compared to 878 in Chesnee.
- Residents in Gilford have a higher median age of 47.5 years compared to 38.8 years in Chesnee.
- Gilford has a higher median income of $75,964 compared to $42,727 in Chesnee.
- In Chesnee, the percentage of married families is higher at 20.0%, compared to 0.6% in Gilford.
- The poverty level is higher in Chesnee at 10%, compared to 6% in Gilford.
- Chesnee has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.2% in Gilford.
Demographics
Demographics Gilford vs Chesnee provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gilford | Chesnee |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 0.5 | 11 |
| White | 96.2 | 85 |
| Asian | 0.7 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1.6 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 1.0 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gilford vs Chesnee
- In Chesnee, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 0.5% in Gilford.
- Gilford has a higher percentage of White residents at 96.2% compared to 85% in Chesnee.
- The Asian population is larger in Gilford at 0.7% compared to 0% in Chesnee.
- Chesnee has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 1.6% in Gilford.
- Both Gilford and Chesnee have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 1.0%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gilford and Chesnee at 0.0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gilford | Chesnee |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 21.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 15.6% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 26.3% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 25.0% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 14.3% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 39.6% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gilford vs Chesnee
- In Chesnee, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.4% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chesnee at 26.3% versus 0.0% in Gilford.
- Chesnee has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chesnee at 14.3% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Chesnee has higher obesity rates at 39.6% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chesnee at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gilford | Chesnee |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 14.0% (123) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 14.9% (131) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 8.0% (70) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gilford vs Chesnee
- In Chesnee, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- In Chesnee, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chesnee at 14.9%, compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- In Chesnee, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.0% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.