Demographics details for Gilbert, AZ vs Waukegan, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gilbert, AZ vs Waukegan, IL.
| Data | Gilbert | Waukegan |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 275,346 | 87,976 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 34.5 years |
| Median Income | $115,179 | $66,077 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 6.4 |
Population Comparison: Gilbert vs Waukegan
- In Gilbert, the population is higher at 275,346, compared to 87,976 in Waukegan.
- Residents in Gilbert have a higher median age of 35.4 years compared to 34.5 years in Waukegan.
- Gilbert has a higher median income of $115,179 compared to $66,077 in Waukegan.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gilbert at 42.0% compared to 35.0% in Waukegan.
- The poverty level is higher in Waukegan at 14%, compared to 6% in Gilbert.
- Waukegan has a higher unemployment rate at 6.4% compared to 3.0% in Gilbert.
Demographics
Demographics Gilbert vs Waukegan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gilbert | Waukegan |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 18 |
| White | 62 | 2 |
| Asian | 6 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 54 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 18 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Gilbert vs Waukegan
- In Waukegan, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 4% in Gilbert.
- Gilbert has a higher percentage of White residents at 62% compared to 2% in Waukegan.
- In Waukegan, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 6% in Gilbert.
- Waukegan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 54%, compared to 17% in Gilbert.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Waukegan at 18%, compared to 10% in Gilbert.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gilbert and Waukegan at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gilbert | Waukegan |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 19.0% | 17.9% |
| Smoking | 11.3% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 27.2% | 39.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gilbert vs Waukegan
- In Waukegan, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 15.2% in Gilbert.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gilbert at 19.0% compared to 17.9% in Waukegan.
- Waukegan has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 11.3% in Gilbert.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gilbert at 19.1% compared to 15.2% in Waukegan.
- Waukegan has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 27.2% in Gilbert.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Waukegan at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Gilbert.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gilbert | Waukegan |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (1,279) | 3.1% (2,711) |
| High School Diploma | 8.1% (22,388) | 16.5% (14,503) |
| Less than High School | 4.0% (10,945) | 27.1% (23,842) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.4% (78,297) | 13.9% (12,220) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gilbert vs Waukegan
- In Waukegan, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.5% in Gilbert.
- In Waukegan, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.5% compared to 8.1% in Gilbert.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Waukegan at 27.1%, compared to 4.0% in Gilbert.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gilbert hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.4% compared to 13.9% in Waukegan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.