Demographics details for Gilbert, AZ vs Washburn, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gilbert, AZ vs Washburn, WI.
| Data | Gilbert | Washburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 275,346 | 16,911 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 52.2 years |
| Median Income | $115,179 | $58,504 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Gilbert vs Washburn
- In Gilbert, the population is higher at 275,346, compared to 16,911 in Washburn.
- The median age in Washburn is higher at 52.2 years, compared to 35.4 years in Gilbert.
- Gilbert has a higher median income of $115,179 compared to $58,504 in Washburn.
- In Washburn, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 42.0% in Gilbert.
- The poverty level is higher in Washburn at 8%, compared to 6% in Gilbert.
- Washburn has a higher unemployment rate at 3.3% compared to 3.0% in Gilbert.
Demographics
Demographics Gilbert vs Washburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gilbert | Washburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 1 |
| White | 62 | 92 |
| Asian | 6 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Gilbert vs Washburn
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gilbert at 4% compared to 1% in Washburn.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Washburn at 92% compared to 62% in Gilbert.
- The Asian population is larger in Gilbert at 6% compared to 1% in Washburn.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gilbert at 17% compared to 2% in Washburn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gilbert at 10% compared to 3% in Washburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gilbert and Washburn at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gilbert | Washburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 10.5% |
| Depression | 19.0% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 11.3% | 17.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 23.4% |
| Obesity | 27.2% | 34.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gilbert vs Washburn
- In Washburn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 15.2% in Gilbert.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Washburn at 24.3% versus 19.0% in Gilbert.
- Washburn has a higher smoking rate at 17.4% compared to 11.3% in Gilbert.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Washburn at 23.4% compared to 19.1% in Gilbert.
- Washburn has higher obesity rates at 34.0% compared to 27.2% in Gilbert.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Washburn at 16.0% compared to 7.0% in Gilbert.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gilbert | Washburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (1,279) | 0.7% (115) |
| High School Diploma | 8.1% (22,388) | 22.9% (3,881) |
| Less than High School | 4.0% (10,945) | 9.6% (1,628) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.4% (78,297) | 17.2% (2,913) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gilbert vs Washburn
- In Washburn, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Gilbert.
- In Washburn, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.9% compared to 8.1% in Gilbert.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Washburn at 9.6%, compared to 4.0% in Gilbert.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gilbert hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.4% compared to 17.2% in Washburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.