Demographics details for Gilbert, AZ vs Pangburn, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gilbert, AZ vs Pangburn, AR.
| Data | Gilbert | Pangburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 275,346 | 503 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 40.4 years |
| Median Income | $115,179 | $29,024 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Gilbert vs Pangburn
- In Gilbert, the population is higher at 275,346, compared to 503 in Pangburn.
- The median age in Pangburn is higher at 40.4 years, compared to 35.4 years in Gilbert.
- Gilbert has a higher median income of $115,179 compared to $29,024 in Pangburn.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Gilbert and Pangburn at 42.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Pangburn at 18%, compared to 6% in Gilbert.
- Pangburn has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.0% in Gilbert.
Demographics
Demographics Gilbert vs Pangburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gilbert | Pangburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | Data is updating |
| White | 62 | 94 |
| Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 17 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gilbert vs Pangburn
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gilbert at 4% compared to 0% in Pangburn.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pangburn at 94% compared to 62% in Gilbert.
- The Asian population is larger in Gilbert at 6% compared to 0% in Pangburn.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gilbert at 17% compared to 0% in Pangburn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gilbert at 10% compared to 6% in Pangburn.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Gilbert at 1% compared to 0% in Pangburn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gilbert | Pangburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 19.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 14.2% |
| Depression | 19.0% | 27.4% |
| Smoking | 11.3% | 24.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 27.2% | 36.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gilbert vs Pangburn
- In Pangburn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 15.2% in Gilbert.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pangburn at 27.4% versus 19.0% in Gilbert.
- Pangburn has a higher smoking rate at 24.3% compared to 11.3% in Gilbert.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gilbert at 19.1% compared to 15.1% in Pangburn.
- Pangburn has higher obesity rates at 36.5% compared to 27.2% in Gilbert.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pangburn at 28.0% compared to 7.0% in Gilbert.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gilbert | Pangburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (1,279) | 0.4% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 8.1% (22,388) | 35.8% (180) |
| Less than High School | 4.0% (10,945) | 12.1% (61) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.4% (78,297) | 8.0% (40) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gilbert vs Pangburn
- A higher percentage of residents in Gilbert have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Pangburn.
- In Pangburn, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 35.8% compared to 8.1% in Gilbert.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pangburn at 12.1%, compared to 4.0% in Gilbert.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gilbert hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.4% compared to 8.0% in Pangburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.