Demographics details for Gilbert, AZ vs Claremont, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gilbert, AZ vs Claremont, NC.
| Data | Gilbert | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 275,346 | 1,715 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 44.5 years |
| Median Income | $115,179 | $60,735 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Gilbert vs Claremont
- In Gilbert, the population is higher at 275,346, compared to 1,715 in Claremont.
- The median age in Claremont is higher at 44.5 years, compared to 35.4 years in Gilbert.
- Gilbert has a higher median income of $115,179 compared to $60,735 in Claremont.
- In Claremont, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 42.0% in Gilbert.
- The poverty level is higher in Claremont at 12%, compared to 6% in Gilbert.
- Claremont has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.0% in Gilbert.
Demographics
Demographics Gilbert vs Claremont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gilbert | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 4 |
| White | 62 | 74 |
| Asian | 6 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gilbert vs Claremont
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Gilbert and Claremont at 4%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Claremont at 74% compared to 62% in Gilbert.
- The Asian population is larger in Gilbert at 6% compared to 1% in Claremont.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gilbert at 17% compared to 10% in Claremont.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Claremont at 11%, compared to 10% in Gilbert.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Gilbert at 1% compared to 0% in Claremont.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gilbert | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 19.0% | 25.9% |
| Smoking | 11.3% | 17.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 19.2% |
| Obesity | 27.2% | 35.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gilbert vs Claremont
- In Claremont, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 15.2% in Gilbert.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Claremont at 25.9% versus 19.0% in Gilbert.
- Claremont has a higher smoking rate at 17.5% compared to 11.3% in Gilbert.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Claremont at 19.2% compared to 19.1% in Gilbert.
- Claremont has higher obesity rates at 35.1% compared to 27.2% in Gilbert.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Claremont at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Gilbert.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gilbert | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (1,279) | 0.3% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 8.1% (22,388) | 27.6% (474) |
| Less than High School | 4.0% (10,945) | 10.7% (184) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.4% (78,297) | 16.7% (287) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gilbert vs Claremont
- A higher percentage of residents in Gilbert have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Claremont.
- In Claremont, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.6% compared to 8.1% in Gilbert.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Claremont at 10.7%, compared to 4.0% in Gilbert.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gilbert hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.4% compared to 16.7% in Claremont.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.