Demographics details for Gilbert, AZ vs Cherokee, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gilbert, AZ vs Cherokee, OK.
| Data | Gilbert | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 275,346 | 48,098 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $115,179 | $52,410 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Gilbert vs Cherokee
- In Gilbert, the population is higher at 275,346, compared to 48,098 in Cherokee.
- The median age in Cherokee is higher at 36.5 years, compared to 35.4 years in Gilbert.
- Gilbert has a higher median income of $115,179 compared to $52,410 in Cherokee.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gilbert at 42.0% compared to 38.0% in Cherokee.
- The poverty level is higher in Cherokee at 15%, compared to 6% in Gilbert.
- Cherokee has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.0% in Gilbert.
Demographics
Demographics Gilbert vs Cherokee provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gilbert | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 1 |
| White | 62 | 42 |
| Asian | 6 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 15 |
| American Indian | 1 | 33 |
Demographics Comparison: Gilbert vs Cherokee
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gilbert at 4% compared to 1% in Cherokee.
- Gilbert has a higher percentage of White residents at 62% compared to 42% in Cherokee.
- The Asian population is larger in Gilbert at 6% compared to 1% in Cherokee.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gilbert at 17% compared to 8% in Cherokee.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cherokee at 15%, compared to 10% in Gilbert.
- In Cherokee, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 33%, compared to 1% in Gilbert.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gilbert | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 19.0% | 26.6% |
| Smoking | 11.3% | 23.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 27.2% | 43.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gilbert vs Cherokee
- In Cherokee, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 15.2% in Gilbert.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cherokee at 26.6% versus 19.0% in Gilbert.
- Cherokee has a higher smoking rate at 23.2% compared to 11.3% in Gilbert.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gilbert at 19.1% compared to 13.8% in Cherokee.
- Cherokee has higher obesity rates at 43.7% compared to 27.2% in Gilbert.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cherokee at 19.0% compared to 7.0% in Gilbert.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gilbert | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (1,279) | 0.9% (433) |
| High School Diploma | 8.1% (22,388) | 15.6% (7,526) |
| Less than High School | 4.0% (10,945) | 11.5% (5,552) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.4% (78,297) | 17.9% (8,612) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gilbert vs Cherokee
- In Cherokee, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.5% in Gilbert.
- In Cherokee, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.6% compared to 8.1% in Gilbert.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cherokee at 11.5%, compared to 4.0% in Gilbert.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gilbert hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.4% compared to 17.9% in Cherokee.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.