Demographics details for Gilbert, AZ vs Centralia, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gilbert, AZ vs Centralia, IL.
| Data | Gilbert | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 275,346 | 11,931 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 40.7 years |
| Median Income | $115,179 | $46,468 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Gilbert vs Centralia
- In Gilbert, the population is higher at 275,346, compared to 11,931 in Centralia.
- The median age in Centralia is higher at 40.7 years, compared to 35.4 years in Gilbert.
- Gilbert has a higher median income of $115,179 compared to $46,468 in Centralia.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gilbert at 42.0% compared to 33.0% in Centralia.
- The poverty level is higher in Centralia at 12%, compared to 6% in Gilbert.
- Centralia has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.0% in Gilbert.
Demographics
Demographics Gilbert vs Centralia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gilbert | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 10 |
| White | 62 | 79 |
| Asian | 6 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gilbert vs Centralia
- In Centralia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 4% in Gilbert.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Centralia at 79% compared to 62% in Gilbert.
- The Asian population is larger in Gilbert at 6% compared to 2% in Centralia.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gilbert at 17% compared to 4% in Centralia.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gilbert at 10% compared to 5% in Centralia.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Gilbert at 1% compared to 0% in Centralia.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gilbert | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 19.0% | 23.9% |
| Smoking | 11.3% | 22.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 27.2% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gilbert vs Centralia
- In Centralia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 15.2% in Gilbert.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Centralia at 23.9% versus 19.0% in Gilbert.
- Centralia has a higher smoking rate at 22.7% compared to 11.3% in Gilbert.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gilbert at 19.1% compared to 16.4% in Centralia.
- Centralia has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 27.2% in Gilbert.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Centralia at 22.0% compared to 7.0% in Gilbert.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gilbert | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (1,279) | 0.6% (72) |
| High School Diploma | 8.1% (22,388) | 18.8% (2,243) |
| Less than High School | 4.0% (10,945) | 13.7% (1,638) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.4% (78,297) | 12.5% (1,494) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gilbert vs Centralia
- In Centralia, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Gilbert.
- In Centralia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 8.1% in Gilbert.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Centralia at 13.7%, compared to 4.0% in Gilbert.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gilbert hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.4% compared to 12.5% in Centralia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.