Demographics details for Giddings, TX vs Shelbina, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Giddings, TX vs Shelbina, MO.
| Data | Giddings | Shelbina |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,129 | 1,582 |
| Median Age | 40.2 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $63,529 | $52,050 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Giddings vs Shelbina
- In Giddings, the population is higher at 5,129, compared to 1,582 in Shelbina.
- Residents in Giddings have a higher median age of 40.2 years compared to 37.6 years in Shelbina.
- Giddings has a higher median income of $63,529 compared to $52,050 in Shelbina.
- In Shelbina, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 34.0% in Giddings.
- The poverty level is higher in Shelbina at 11%, compared to 10% in Giddings.
- The unemployment rate in Giddings is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.5% in Shelbina.
Demographics
Demographics Giddings vs Shelbina provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Giddings | Shelbina |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 5 |
| White | 24 | 89 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 48 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 1 |
| American Indian | 4 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Giddings vs Shelbina
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Giddings at 11% compared to 5% in Shelbina.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Shelbina at 89% compared to 24% in Giddings.
- The Asian population is larger in Giddings at 1% compared to 0% in Shelbina.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Giddings at 48% compared to 3% in Shelbina.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Giddings at 12% compared to 1% in Shelbina.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Giddings at 4% compared to 2% in Shelbina.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Giddings | Shelbina |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 23.2% | 26.4% |
| Smoking | 19.6% | 23.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 40.0% | 39.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Giddings vs Shelbina
- In Shelbina, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.6% in Giddings.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Shelbina at 26.4% versus 23.2% in Giddings.
- Shelbina has a higher smoking rate at 23.4% compared to 19.6% in Giddings.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Shelbina at 17.6% compared to 16.8% in Giddings.
- Obesity rates are higher in Giddings at 40.0% compared to 39.6% in Shelbina.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Shelbina at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Giddings.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Giddings | Shelbina |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (53) | 0.2% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 26.1% (1,341) | 31.1% (492) |
| Less than High School | 22.3% (1,143) | 17.6% (279) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (453) | 14.2% (225) |
Education Levels Comparison: Giddings vs Shelbina
- A higher percentage of residents in Giddings have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.2% in Shelbina.
- In Shelbina, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.1% compared to 26.1% in Giddings.
- More residents in Giddings have less than a high school education at 22.3% compared to 17.6% in Shelbina.
- In Shelbina, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.2% compared to 8.8% in Giddings.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.