Demographics details for Giddings, TX vs Laurelville, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Giddings, TX vs Laurelville, OH.
| Data | Giddings | Laurelville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,129 | 506 |
| Median Age | 40.2 years | 36.1 years |
| Median Income | $63,529 | $50,357 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Giddings vs Laurelville
- In Giddings, the population is higher at 5,129, compared to 506 in Laurelville.
- Residents in Giddings have a higher median age of 40.2 years compared to 36.1 years in Laurelville.
- Giddings has a higher median income of $63,529 compared to $50,357 in Laurelville.
- In Laurelville, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 34.0% in Giddings.
- The poverty level is higher in Laurelville at 12%, compared to 10% in Giddings.
- The unemployment rate in Giddings is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.5% in Laurelville.
Demographics
Demographics Giddings vs Laurelville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Giddings | Laurelville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | Data is updating |
| White | 24 | 88 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 48 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 12 |
| American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Giddings vs Laurelville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Giddings at 11% compared to 0% in Laurelville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Laurelville at 88% compared to 24% in Giddings.
- The Asian population is larger in Giddings at 1% compared to 0% in Laurelville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Giddings at 48% compared to 0% in Laurelville.
- Both Giddings and Laurelville have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 12%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Giddings at 4% compared to 0% in Laurelville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Giddings | Laurelville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 20.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 14.8% |
| Depression | 23.2% | 26.8% |
| Smoking | 19.6% | 27.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 40.0% | 45.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Giddings vs Laurelville
- In Laurelville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 18.6% in Giddings.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Laurelville at 26.8% versus 23.2% in Giddings.
- Laurelville has a higher smoking rate at 27.9% compared to 19.6% in Giddings.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Laurelville at 17.0% compared to 16.8% in Giddings.
- Laurelville has higher obesity rates at 45.9% compared to 40.0% in Giddings.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Laurelville at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Giddings.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Giddings | Laurelville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (53) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 26.1% (1,341) | 41.5% (210) |
| Less than High School | 22.3% (1,143) | 18.2% (92) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (453) | 2.8% (14) |
Education Levels Comparison: Giddings vs Laurelville
- A higher percentage of residents in Giddings have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Laurelville.
- In Laurelville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 41.5% compared to 26.1% in Giddings.
- More residents in Giddings have less than a high school education at 22.3% compared to 18.2% in Laurelville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Giddings hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.8% compared to 2.8% in Laurelville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.