Demographics details for Gibsonburg, OH vs South plainfield, NJ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Gibsonburg, OH vs South plainfield, NJ.

Data Gibsonburg South plainfield
Population 2,436 24,228
Median Age 38.7 years 41.8 years
Median Income $67,279 $123,417
Married Families 44.0% 50.0%
Poverty Level 10% 6%
Unemployment Rate 4.3 4.2

Population Comparison: Gibsonburg vs South plainfield

  • The population in South plainfield is higher at 24,228, compared to 2,436 in Gibsonburg.
  • The median age in South plainfield is higher at 41.8 years, compared to 38.7 years in Gibsonburg.
  • South plainfield has a higher median income of $123,417, compared to $67,279 in Gibsonburg.
  • In South plainfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 44.0% in Gibsonburg.
  • Gibsonburg has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in South plainfield.
  • The unemployment rate in Gibsonburg is higher at 4.3%, compared to 4.2% in South plainfield.

Demographics

Demographics Gibsonburg vs South plainfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Gibsonburg South plainfield
Black 2 12
White 79 46
Asian Data is updating 17
Hispanic 10 18
Two or More Races 9 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Gibsonburg vs South plainfield

  • In South plainfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 2% in Gibsonburg.
  • Gibsonburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 46% in South plainfield.
  • In South plainfield, the Asian population stands at 17%, greater than 0% in Gibsonburg.
  • South plainfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 10% in Gibsonburg.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Gibsonburg at 9% compared to 7% in South plainfield.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gibsonburg and South plainfield at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Gibsonburg South plainfield
Mental Health Not Good 17.6% 14.4%
Physical Health Not Good 12.3% 9.0%
Depression 23.0% 19.0%
Smoking 21.9% 12.0%
Binge Drinking 18.4% 15.2%
Obesity 42.4% 29.0%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Gibsonburg vs South plainfield

  • More residents in Gibsonburg report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 14.4% in South plainfield.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Gibsonburg at 23.0% compared to 19.0% in South plainfield.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Gibsonburg at 21.9% compared to 12.0% in South plainfield.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Gibsonburg at 18.4% compared to 15.2% in South plainfield.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Gibsonburg at 42.4% compared to 29.0% in South plainfield.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Gibsonburg at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in South plainfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Gibsonburg South plainfield
No Schooling 0.2% (4) 1.4% (328)
High School Diploma 35.6% (867) 16.6% (4,012)
Less than High School 5.1% (125) 9.0% (2,175)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.3% (275) 31.5% (7,629)

Education Levels Comparison: Gibsonburg vs South plainfield

  • In South plainfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.2% in Gibsonburg.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Gibsonburg hold a high school diploma at 35.6% compared to 16.6% in South plainfield.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South plainfield at 9.0%, compared to 5.1% in Gibsonburg.
  • In South plainfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.5% compared to 11.3% in Gibsonburg.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.