Demographics details for Gibsonburg, OH vs Leominster, MA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Gibsonburg, OH vs Leominster, MA.

Data Gibsonburg Leominster
Population 2,436 43,646
Median Age 38.7 years 43.0 years
Median Income $67,279 $75,620
Married Families 44.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 10% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.3 4.2

Population Comparison: Gibsonburg vs Leominster

  • The population in Leominster is higher at 43,646, compared to 2,436 in Gibsonburg.
  • The median age in Leominster is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 38.7 years in Gibsonburg.
  • Leominster has a higher median income of $75,620, compared to $67,279 in Gibsonburg.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Gibsonburg at 44.0% compared to 38.0% in Leominster.
  • Gibsonburg has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Leominster.
  • The unemployment rate in Gibsonburg is higher at 4.3%, compared to 4.2% in Leominster.

Demographics

Demographics Gibsonburg vs Leominster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Gibsonburg Leominster
Black 2 6
White 79 67
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 10 14
Two or More Races 9 10
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Gibsonburg vs Leominster

  • In Leominster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 2% in Gibsonburg.
  • Gibsonburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 67% in Leominster.
  • In Leominster, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Gibsonburg.
  • Leominster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 10% in Gibsonburg.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Leominster at 10%, compared to 9% in Gibsonburg.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gibsonburg and Leominster at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Gibsonburg Leominster
Mental Health Not Good 17.6% 17.9%
Physical Health Not Good 12.3% 10.6%
Depression 23.0% 23.5%
Smoking 21.9% 15.5%
Binge Drinking 18.4% 16.9%
Obesity 42.4% 32.8%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Gibsonburg vs Leominster

  • In Leominster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 17.6% in Gibsonburg.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Leominster at 23.5% versus 23.0% in Gibsonburg.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Gibsonburg at 21.9% compared to 15.5% in Leominster.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Gibsonburg at 18.4% compared to 16.9% in Leominster.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Gibsonburg at 42.4% compared to 32.8% in Leominster.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Leominster at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Gibsonburg.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Gibsonburg Leominster
No Schooling 0.2% (4) 1.1% (477)
High School Diploma 35.6% (867) 18.2% (7,932)
Less than High School 5.1% (125) 13.5% (5,889)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.3% (275) 24.1% (10,530)

Education Levels Comparison: Gibsonburg vs Leominster

  • In Leominster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.2% in Gibsonburg.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Gibsonburg hold a high school diploma at 35.6% compared to 18.2% in Leominster.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Leominster at 13.5%, compared to 5.1% in Gibsonburg.
  • In Leominster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.1% compared to 11.3% in Gibsonburg.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.