Demographics details for Gibsonburg, OH vs Diamond springs, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Gibsonburg, OH vs Diamond springs, CA.

Data Gibsonburg Diamond springs
Population 2,436 12,197
Median Age 38.7 years 43.7 years
Median Income $67,279 $71,279
Married Families 44.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 10% 11%
Unemployment Rate 4.3 4.2

Population Comparison: Gibsonburg vs Diamond springs

  • The population in Diamond springs is higher at 12,197, compared to 2,436 in Gibsonburg.
  • The median age in Diamond springs is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 38.7 years in Gibsonburg.
  • Diamond springs has a higher median income of $71,279, compared to $67,279 in Gibsonburg.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Gibsonburg and Diamond springs at 44.0%.
  • The poverty level is higher in Diamond springs at 11%, compared to 10% in Gibsonburg.
  • The unemployment rate in Gibsonburg is higher at 4.3%, compared to 4.2% in Diamond springs.

Demographics

Demographics Gibsonburg vs Diamond springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Gibsonburg Diamond springs
Black 2 Data is updating
White 79 72
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 10 18
Two or More Races 9 6
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Gibsonburg vs Diamond springs

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gibsonburg at 2% compared to 0% in Diamond springs.
  • Gibsonburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 72% in Diamond springs.
  • In Diamond springs, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Gibsonburg.
  • Diamond springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 10% in Gibsonburg.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Gibsonburg at 9% compared to 6% in Diamond springs.
  • In Diamond springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Gibsonburg.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Gibsonburg Diamond springs
Mental Health Not Good 17.6% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good 12.3% 10.4%
Depression 23.0% 23.2%
Smoking 21.9% 12.7%
Binge Drinking 18.4% 19.0%
Obesity 42.4% 29.1%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Gibsonburg vs Diamond springs

  • More residents in Gibsonburg report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 16.7% in Diamond springs.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Diamond springs at 23.2% versus 23.0% in Gibsonburg.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Gibsonburg at 21.9% compared to 12.7% in Diamond springs.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Diamond springs at 19.0% compared to 18.4% in Gibsonburg.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Gibsonburg at 42.4% compared to 29.1% in Diamond springs.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Diamond springs at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Gibsonburg.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Gibsonburg Diamond springs
No Schooling 0.2% (4) 0.6% (73)
High School Diploma 35.6% (867) 17.2% (2,093)
Less than High School 5.1% (125) 5.8% (711)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.3% (275) 18.6% (2,271)

Education Levels Comparison: Gibsonburg vs Diamond springs

  • In Diamond springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in Gibsonburg.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Gibsonburg hold a high school diploma at 35.6% compared to 17.2% in Diamond springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Diamond springs at 5.8%, compared to 5.1% in Gibsonburg.
  • In Diamond springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 11.3% in Gibsonburg.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.