Demographics details for Gibsonburg, OH vs Dahlonega, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gibsonburg, OH vs Dahlonega, GA.
| Data | Gibsonburg | Dahlonega |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,436 | 7,461 |
| Median Age | 38.7 years | 21.8 years |
| Median Income | $67,279 | $57,941 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Gibsonburg vs Dahlonega
- The population in Dahlonega is higher at 7,461, compared to 2,436 in Gibsonburg.
- Residents in Gibsonburg have a higher median age of 38.7 years compared to 21.8 years in Dahlonega.
- Gibsonburg has a higher median income of $67,279 compared to $57,941 in Dahlonega.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gibsonburg at 44.0% compared to 28.0% in Dahlonega.
- The poverty level is higher in Dahlonega at 12%, compared to 10% in Gibsonburg.
- The unemployment rate in Gibsonburg is higher at 4.3%, compared to 3.2% in Dahlonega.
Demographics
Demographics Gibsonburg vs Dahlonega provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gibsonburg | Dahlonega |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 5 |
| White | 79 | 84 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 10 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Gibsonburg vs Dahlonega
- In Dahlonega, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 2% in Gibsonburg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Dahlonega at 84% compared to 79% in Gibsonburg.
- Both Gibsonburg and Dahlonega have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gibsonburg at 10% compared to 6% in Dahlonega.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gibsonburg at 9% compared to 4% in Dahlonega.
- In Dahlonega, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Gibsonburg.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gibsonburg | Dahlonega |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 23.0% | 23.9% |
| Smoking | 21.9% | 19.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 42.4% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gibsonburg vs Dahlonega
- In Dahlonega, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 17.6% in Gibsonburg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Dahlonega at 23.9% versus 23.0% in Gibsonburg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gibsonburg at 21.9% compared to 19.4% in Dahlonega.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gibsonburg at 18.4% compared to 16.7% in Dahlonega.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gibsonburg at 42.4% compared to 34.9% in Dahlonega.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Dahlonega at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Gibsonburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gibsonburg | Dahlonega |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (4) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 35.6% (867) | 7.5% (556) |
| Less than High School | 5.1% (125) | 3.2% (236) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.3% (275) | 20.8% (1,554) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gibsonburg vs Dahlonega
- A higher percentage of residents in Gibsonburg have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Dahlonega.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gibsonburg hold a high school diploma at 35.6% compared to 7.5% in Dahlonega.
- More residents in Gibsonburg have less than a high school education at 5.1% compared to 3.2% in Dahlonega.
- In Dahlonega, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.8% compared to 11.3% in Gibsonburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.