Demographics details for Gibsonburg, OH vs Clifton hill, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gibsonburg, OH vs Clifton hill, MO.
| Data | Gibsonburg | Clifton hill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,436 | 87 |
| Median Age | 38.7 years | 28.3 years |
| Median Income | $67,279 | $45,500 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Gibsonburg vs Clifton hill
- In Gibsonburg, the population is higher at 2,436, compared to 87 in Clifton hill.
- Residents in Gibsonburg have a higher median age of 38.7 years compared to 28.3 years in Clifton hill.
- Gibsonburg has a higher median income of $67,279 compared to $45,500 in Clifton hill.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gibsonburg at 44.0% compared to 31.0% in Clifton hill.
- The poverty level is identical in both Gibsonburg and Clifton hill at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Gibsonburg is higher at 4.3%, compared to 3.5% in Clifton hill.
Demographics
Demographics Gibsonburg vs Clifton hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gibsonburg | Clifton hill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 79 | 94 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 10 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gibsonburg vs Clifton hill
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gibsonburg at 2% compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clifton hill at 94% compared to 79% in Gibsonburg.
- Both Gibsonburg and Clifton hill have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gibsonburg at 10% compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gibsonburg at 9% compared to 6% in Clifton hill.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gibsonburg and Clifton hill at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gibsonburg | Clifton hill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 14.3% |
| Depression | 23.0% | 25.9% |
| Smoking | 21.9% | 21.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 42.4% | 41.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gibsonburg vs Clifton hill
- In Clifton hill, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 17.6% in Gibsonburg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clifton hill at 25.9% versus 23.0% in Gibsonburg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gibsonburg at 21.9% compared to 21.4% in Clifton hill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gibsonburg at 18.4% compared to 16.0% in Clifton hill.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gibsonburg at 42.4% compared to 41.6% in Clifton hill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gibsonburg at 11.0% compared to 6.0% in Clifton hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gibsonburg | Clifton hill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (4) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 35.6% (867) | 26.4% (23) |
| Less than High School | 5.1% (125) | 13.8% (12) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.3% (275) | 3.4% (3) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gibsonburg vs Clifton hill
- A higher percentage of residents in Gibsonburg have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Clifton hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gibsonburg hold a high school diploma at 35.6% compared to 26.4% in Clifton hill.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clifton hill at 13.8%, compared to 5.1% in Gibsonburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gibsonburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.3% compared to 3.4% in Clifton hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.