Demographics details for Gibsonburg, OH vs Clearwater, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gibsonburg, OH vs Clearwater, FL.
Data | Gibsonburg | Clearwater |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,436 | 117,027 |
Median Age | 38.7 years | 46.0 years |
Median Income | $67,279 | $59,358 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Gibsonburg vs Clearwater
- The population in Clearwater is higher at 117,027, compared to 2,436 in Gibsonburg.
- The median age in Clearwater is higher at 46.0 years, compared to 38.7 years in Gibsonburg.
- Gibsonburg has a higher median income of $67,279 compared to $59,358 in Clearwater.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gibsonburg at 44.0% compared to 37.0% in Clearwater.
- The poverty level is higher in Clearwater at 11%, compared to 10% in Gibsonburg.
- The unemployment rate in Gibsonburg is higher at 4.3%, compared to 3.2% in Clearwater.
Demographics
Demographics Gibsonburg vs Clearwater provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Gibsonburg | Clearwater |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 11 |
White | 79 | 61 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | 10 | 17 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gibsonburg vs Clearwater
- In Clearwater, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 2% in Gibsonburg.
- Gibsonburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 61% in Clearwater.
- In Clearwater, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Gibsonburg.
- Clearwater has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 10% in Gibsonburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gibsonburg at 9% compared to 8% in Clearwater.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gibsonburg and Clearwater at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Gibsonburg | Clearwater |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 16.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 11.2% |
Depression | 23.0% | 19.3% |
Smoking | 21.9% | 20.8% |
Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 17.2% |
Obesity | 42.4% | 28.9% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gibsonburg vs Clearwater
- More residents in Gibsonburg report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 16.5% in Clearwater.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gibsonburg at 23.0% compared to 19.3% in Clearwater.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gibsonburg at 21.9% compared to 20.8% in Clearwater.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gibsonburg at 18.4% compared to 17.2% in Clearwater.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gibsonburg at 42.4% compared to 28.9% in Clearwater.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clearwater at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Gibsonburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Gibsonburg | Clearwater |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (4) | 0.9% (1,013) |
High School Diploma | 35.6% (867) | 18.8% (22,051) |
Less than High School | 5.1% (125) | 12.4% (14,532) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.3% (275) | 24.0% (28,122) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gibsonburg vs Clearwater
- In Clearwater, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.2% in Gibsonburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gibsonburg hold a high school diploma at 35.6% compared to 18.8% in Clearwater.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clearwater at 12.4%, compared to 5.1% in Gibsonburg.
- In Clearwater, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.0% compared to 11.3% in Gibsonburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.