Demographics details for Georgetown, IN vs Bendena, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Georgetown, IN vs Bendena, KS.

Data Georgetown Bendena
Population 4,497 131
Median Age 42.0 years 31.7 years
Median Income $65,000 $85,962
Married Families 65.0% 66.0%
Poverty Level 5% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.0 Data is updating

Population Comparison: Georgetown vs Bendena

  • In Georgetown, the population is higher at 4,497, compared to 131 in Bendena.
  • Residents in Georgetown have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 31.7 years in Bendena.
  • Bendena has a higher median income of $85,962, compared to $65,000 in Georgetown.
  • In Bendena, the percentage of married families is higher at 66.0%, compared to 65.0% in Georgetown.
  • Georgetown has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Bendena.
  • The unemployment rate in Georgetown is higher at 3.0%, compared to 0.0% in Bendena.

Demographics

Demographics Georgetown vs Bendena provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Georgetown Bendena
Black 5 Data is updating
White 90 100
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 2 Data is updating
Two or More Races 1 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Georgetown vs Bendena

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Georgetown at 5% compared to 0% in Bendena.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Bendena at 100% compared to 90% in Georgetown.
  • The Asian population is larger in Georgetown at 2% compared to 0% in Bendena.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Georgetown at 2% compared to 0% in Bendena.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Georgetown at 1% compared to 0% in Bendena.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Georgetown and Bendena at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Georgetown Bendena
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 16.1%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 9.5%
Depression Data is updating% 22.5%
Smoking Data is updating% 16.9%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 19.2%
Obesity Data is updating% 37.1%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Georgetown vs Bendena

  • In Bendena, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 0.0% in Georgetown.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Bendena at 22.5% versus 0.0% in Georgetown.
  • Bendena has a higher smoking rate at 16.9% compared to 0.0% in Georgetown.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Bendena at 19.2% compared to 0.0% in Georgetown.
  • Bendena has higher obesity rates at 37.1% compared to 0.0% in Georgetown.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bendena at 8.0% compared to 0.0% in Georgetown.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Georgetown Bendena
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 32.8% (43)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 22.1% (29)

Education Levels Comparison: Georgetown vs Bendena

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Georgetown and Bendena at 0.0%.
  • In Bendena, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 32.8% compared to 0.0% in Georgetown.
  • Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 0.0%.
  • In Bendena, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.1% compared to 0.0% in Georgetown.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.