Demographics details for Gatesville, TX vs Union springs, AL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Gatesville, TX vs Union springs, AL.

Data Gatesville Union springs
Population 16,198 3,242
Median Age 39.4 years 28.1 years
Median Income $46,536 $24,921
Married Families 27.0% 17.0%
Poverty Level 12% 25%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 5.2

Population Comparison: Gatesville vs Union springs

  • In Gatesville, the population is higher at 16,198, compared to 3,242 in Union springs.
  • Residents in Gatesville have a higher median age of 39.4 years compared to 28.1 years in Union springs.
  • Gatesville has a higher median income of $46,536 compared to $24,921 in Union springs.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Gatesville at 27.0% compared to 17.0% in Union springs.
  • The poverty level is higher in Union springs at 25%, compared to 12% in Gatesville.
  • Union springs has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.5% in Gatesville.

Demographics

Demographics Gatesville vs Union springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Gatesville Union springs
Black 15 69
White 42 4
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 25 22
Two or More Races 17 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Gatesville vs Union springs

  • In Union springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 69% compared to 15% in Gatesville.
  • Gatesville has a higher percentage of White residents at 42% compared to 4% in Union springs.
  • Both Gatesville and Union springs have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Gatesville at 25% compared to 22% in Union springs.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Gatesville at 17% compared to 4% in Union springs.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gatesville and Union springs at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Gatesville Union springs
Mental Health Not Good 21.2% 21.3%
Physical Health Not Good 14.3% 16.9%
Depression 29.6% 20.8%
Smoking 22.2% 25.5%
Binge Drinking 15.1% 11.1%
Obesity 43.6% 49.5%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Gatesville vs Union springs

  • In Union springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 21.2% in Gatesville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Gatesville at 29.6% compared to 20.8% in Union springs.
  • Union springs has a higher smoking rate at 25.5% compared to 22.2% in Gatesville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Gatesville at 15.1% compared to 11.1% in Union springs.
  • Union springs has higher obesity rates at 49.5% compared to 43.6% in Gatesville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Union springs at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Gatesville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Gatesville Union springs
No Schooling 0.8% (133) 3.6% (117)
High School Diploma 13.1% (2,118) 15.1% (489)
Less than High School 28.0% (4,538) 33.7% (1,092)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 6.9% (1,111) 7.3% (237)

Education Levels Comparison: Gatesville vs Union springs

  • In Union springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 0.8% in Gatesville.
  • In Union springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.1% compared to 13.1% in Gatesville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Union springs at 33.7%, compared to 28.0% in Gatesville.
  • In Union springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.3% compared to 6.9% in Gatesville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.