Demographics details for Gatesville, TX vs Fairfield, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gatesville, TX vs Fairfield, CA.
| Data | Gatesville | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,198 | 119,338 |
| Median Age | 39.4 years | 35.8 years |
| Median Income | $46,536 | $98,857 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Gatesville vs Fairfield
- The population in Fairfield is higher at 119,338, compared to 16,198 in Gatesville.
- Residents in Gatesville have a higher median age of 39.4 years compared to 35.8 years in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher median income of $98,857, compared to $46,536 in Gatesville.
- In Fairfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 27.0% in Gatesville.
- The poverty level is identical in both Gatesville and Fairfield at 12%.
- Fairfield has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.5% in Gatesville.
Demographics
Demographics Gatesville vs Fairfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gatesville | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 15 |
| White | 42 | 23 |
| Asian | 1 | 18 |
| Hispanic | 25 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gatesville vs Fairfield
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Gatesville and Fairfield at 15%.
- Gatesville has a higher percentage of White residents at 42% compared to 23% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 1% in Gatesville.
- Fairfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 25% in Gatesville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gatesville at 17% compared to 14% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gatesville and Fairfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gatesville | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.2% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 29.6% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 22.2% | 11.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 43.6% | 30.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gatesville vs Fairfield
- More residents in Gatesville report poor mental health at 21.2% compared to 15.8% in Fairfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gatesville at 29.6% compared to 17.7% in Fairfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gatesville at 22.2% compared to 11.9% in Fairfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairfield at 16.1% compared to 15.1% in Gatesville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gatesville at 43.6% compared to 30.1% in Fairfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairfield at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Gatesville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gatesville | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (133) | 2.1% (2,515) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (2,118) | 13.7% (16,358) |
| Less than High School | 28.0% (4,538) | 14.6% (17,464) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.9% (1,111) | 18.3% (21,856) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gatesville vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.8% in Gatesville.
- In Fairfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.7% compared to 13.1% in Gatesville.
- More residents in Gatesville have less than a high school education at 28.0% compared to 14.6% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 6.9% in Gatesville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.