Demographics details for Garrison, KY vs Fremont, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Garrison, KY vs Fremont, OH.
| Data | Garrison | Fremont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 888 | 15,825 |
| Median Age | 55.7 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $40,156 | $48,252 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Garrison vs Fremont
- The population in Fremont is higher at 15,825, compared to 888 in Garrison.
- Residents in Garrison have a higher median age of 55.7 years compared to 35.7 years in Fremont.
- Fremont has a higher median income of $48,252, compared to $40,156 in Garrison.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Garrison at 44.0% compared to 30.0% in Fremont.
- The poverty level is higher in Fremont at 14%, compared to 12% in Garrison.
- Fremont has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.5% in Garrison.
Demographics
Demographics Garrison vs Fremont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Garrison | Fremont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 9 |
| White | 100 | 68 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 15 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Garrison vs Fremont
- In Fremont, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 0% in Garrison.
- Garrison has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 68% in Fremont.
- Both Garrison and Fremont have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Fremont has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 0% in Garrison.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fremont at 8%, compared to 0% in Garrison.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Garrison and Fremont at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Garrison | Fremont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.0% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.8% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 30.5% | 22.5% |
| Smoking | 26.0% | 22.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 44.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Garrison vs Fremont
- More residents in Garrison report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 18.0% in Fremont.
- Depression is more prevalent in Garrison at 30.5% compared to 22.5% in Fremont.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Garrison at 26.0% compared to 22.9% in Fremont.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fremont at 17.4% compared to 15.3% in Garrison.
- Fremont has higher obesity rates at 44.3% compared to 39.9% in Garrison.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Garrison and Fremont at 17.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Garrison | Fremont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (57) |
| High School Diploma | 19.3% (171) | 24.8% (3,931) |
| Less than High School | 50.9% (452) | 10.0% (1,586) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 3.6% (32) | 10.4% (1,641) |
Education Levels Comparison: Garrison vs Fremont
- In Fremont, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Garrison.
- In Fremont, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.8% compared to 19.3% in Garrison.
- More residents in Garrison have less than a high school education at 50.9% compared to 10.0% in Fremont.
- In Fremont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.4% compared to 3.6% in Garrison.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.