Demographics details for Garland, TX vs Cedar grove, WV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Garland, TX vs Cedar grove, WV.
| Data | Garland | Cedar grove |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 240,854 | 693 |
| Median Age | 34.4 years | 44.3 years |
| Median Income | $71,044 | $55,600 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Garland vs Cedar grove
- In Garland, the population is higher at 240,854, compared to 693 in Cedar grove.
- The median age in Cedar grove is higher at 44.3 years, compared to 34.4 years in Garland.
- Garland has a higher median income of $71,044 compared to $55,600 in Cedar grove.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Garland at 39.0% compared to 31.0% in Cedar grove.
- The poverty level is identical in both Garland and Cedar grove at 12%.
- Cedar grove has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.0% in Garland.
Demographics
Demographics Garland vs Cedar grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Garland | Cedar grove |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 16 | Data is updating |
| White | 6 | 98 |
| Asian | 11 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 45 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 21 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Garland vs Cedar grove
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Garland at 16% compared to 0% in Cedar grove.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar grove at 98% compared to 6% in Garland.
- The Asian population is larger in Garland at 11% compared to 0% in Cedar grove.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Garland at 45% compared to 0% in Cedar grove.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Garland at 21% compared to 2% in Cedar grove.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Garland at 1% compared to 0% in Cedar grove.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Garland | Cedar grove |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 22.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 15.7% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 30.1% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 24.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 13.9% |
| Obesity | 33.9% | 40.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Garland vs Cedar grove
- In Cedar grove, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.3% compared to 17.1% in Garland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar grove at 30.1% versus 22.2% in Garland.
- Cedar grove has a higher smoking rate at 24.6% compared to 17.2% in Garland.
- Binge drinking is more common in Garland at 17.6% compared to 13.9% in Cedar grove.
- Cedar grove has higher obesity rates at 40.4% compared to 33.9% in Garland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cedar grove at 20.0% compared to 9.0% in Garland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Garland | Cedar grove |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (6,080) | 0.6% (4) |
| High School Diploma | 13.9% (33,524) | 21.2% (147) |
| Less than High School | 24.7% (59,406) | 18.5% (128) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.5% (37,249) | 2.3% (16) |
Education Levels Comparison: Garland vs Cedar grove
- A higher percentage of residents in Garland have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.6% in Cedar grove.
- In Cedar grove, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.2% compared to 13.9% in Garland.
- More residents in Garland have less than a high school education at 24.7% compared to 18.5% in Cedar grove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Garland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 2.3% in Cedar grove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.