Demographics details for Garland, TX vs Bonita springs, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Garland, TX vs Bonita springs, FL.
Data | Garland | Bonita springs |
---|---|---|
Population | 240,854 | 56,370 |
Median Age | 34.4 years | 60.2 years |
Median Income | $71,044 | $84,668 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 54.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Garland vs Bonita springs
- In Garland, the population is higher at 240,854, compared to 56,370 in Bonita springs.
- The median age in Bonita springs is higher at 60.2 years, compared to 34.4 years in Garland.
- Bonita springs has a higher median income of $84,668, compared to $71,044 in Garland.
- In Bonita springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 39.0% in Garland.
- Garland has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Bonita springs.
- The unemployment rate in Garland is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.1% in Bonita springs.
Demographics
Demographics Garland vs Bonita springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Garland | Bonita springs |
---|---|---|
Black | 16 | 2 |
White | 6 | 68 |
Asian | 11 | 1 |
Hispanic | 45 | 21 |
Two or More Races | 21 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Garland vs Bonita springs
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Garland at 16% compared to 2% in Bonita springs.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bonita springs at 68% compared to 6% in Garland.
- The Asian population is larger in Garland at 11% compared to 1% in Bonita springs.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Garland at 45% compared to 21% in Bonita springs.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Garland at 21% compared to 8% in Bonita springs.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Garland at 1% compared to 0% in Bonita springs.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Garland | Bonita springs |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 14.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 9.7% |
Depression | 22.2% | 17.7% |
Smoking | 17.2% | 16.1% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 18.1% |
Obesity | 33.9% | 26.1% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Garland vs Bonita springs
- More residents in Garland report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 14.4% in Bonita springs.
- Depression is more prevalent in Garland at 22.2% compared to 17.7% in Bonita springs.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Garland at 17.2% compared to 16.1% in Bonita springs.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bonita springs at 18.1% compared to 17.6% in Garland.
- Obesity rates are higher in Garland at 33.9% compared to 26.1% in Bonita springs.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bonita springs at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Garland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Garland | Bonita springs |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.5% (6,080) | 1.4% (810) |
High School Diploma | 13.9% (33,524) | 14.9% (8,384) |
Less than High School | 24.7% (59,406) | 15.7% (8,845) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.5% (37,249) | 33.1% (18,684) |
Education Levels Comparison: Garland vs Bonita springs
- A higher percentage of residents in Garland have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 1.4% in Bonita springs.
- In Bonita springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.9% compared to 13.9% in Garland.
- More residents in Garland have less than a high school education at 24.7% compared to 15.7% in Bonita springs.
- In Bonita springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.1% compared to 15.5% in Garland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.