Demographics details for Garland, TX vs American fork, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Garland, TX vs American fork, UT.
| Data | Garland | American fork |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 240,854 | 37,268 |
| Median Age | 34.4 years | 28.0 years |
| Median Income | $71,044 | $90,490 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Garland vs American fork
- In Garland, the population is higher at 240,854, compared to 37,268 in American fork.
- Residents in Garland have a higher median age of 34.4 years compared to 28.0 years in American fork.
- American fork has a higher median income of $90,490, compared to $71,044 in Garland.
- In American fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 39.0% in Garland.
- Garland has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in American fork.
- American fork has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.0% in Garland.
Demographics
Demographics Garland vs American fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Garland | American fork |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 16 | Data is updating |
| White | 6 | 84 |
| Asian | 11 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 45 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 21 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Garland vs American fork
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Garland at 16% compared to 0% in American fork.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in American fork at 84% compared to 6% in Garland.
- The Asian population is larger in Garland at 11% compared to 1% in American fork.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Garland at 45% compared to 9% in American fork.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Garland at 21% compared to 6% in American fork.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Garland at 1% compared to 0% in American fork.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Garland | American fork |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 9.8% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 6.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 8.5% |
| Obesity | 33.9% | 29.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Garland vs American fork
- More residents in Garland report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 14.2% in American fork.
- Higher depression rates are seen in American fork at 23.4% versus 22.2% in Garland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Garland at 17.2% compared to 6.7% in American fork.
- Binge drinking is more common in Garland at 17.6% compared to 8.5% in American fork.
- Obesity rates are higher in Garland at 33.9% compared to 29.5% in American fork.
- Disability percentages are higher in Garland at 9.0% compared to 8.0% in American fork.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Garland | American fork |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (6,080) | 0.6% (208) |
| High School Diploma | 13.9% (33,524) | 7.4% (2,742) |
| Less than High School | 24.7% (59,406) | 5.7% (2,134) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.5% (37,249) | 21.3% (7,922) |
Education Levels Comparison: Garland vs American fork
- A higher percentage of residents in Garland have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.6% in American fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Garland hold a high school diploma at 13.9% compared to 7.4% in American fork.
- More residents in Garland have less than a high school education at 24.7% compared to 5.7% in American fork.
- In American fork, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 15.5% in Garland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.