Demographics details for Garfield, WA vs Redding, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Garfield, WA vs Redding, CA.
| Data | Garfield | Redding |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,363 | 92,906 |
| Median Age | 49.9 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $57,958 | $67,323 |
| Married Families | 57.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Garfield vs Redding
- The population in Redding is higher at 92,906, compared to 2,363 in Garfield.
- Residents in Garfield have a higher median age of 49.9 years compared to 38.8 years in Redding.
- Redding has a higher median income of $67,323, compared to $57,958 in Garfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Garfield at 57.0% compared to 36.0% in Redding.
- The poverty level is higher in Redding at 13%, compared to 0% in Garfield.
- Redding has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.4% in Garfield.
Demographics
Demographics Garfield vs Redding provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Garfield | Redding |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 88 | 71 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Garfield vs Redding
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Garfield and Redding at 1%.
- Garfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 71% in Redding.
- In Redding, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Garfield.
- Redding has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 4% in Garfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Redding at 10%, compared to 6% in Garfield.
- In Redding, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Garfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Garfield | Redding |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 18.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 11.9% |
| Depression | 28.7% | 22.1% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 15.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 40.3% | 30.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Garfield vs Redding
- In Redding, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 17.2% in Garfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Garfield at 28.7% compared to 22.1% in Redding.
- Redding has a higher smoking rate at 15.0% compared to 14.6% in Garfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Garfield at 18.2% compared to 17.6% in Redding.
- Obesity rates are higher in Garfield at 40.3% compared to 30.9% in Redding.
- Disability percentages are higher in Garfield at 23.0% compared to 17.0% in Redding.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Garfield | Redding |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.6% (581) |
| High School Diploma | 15.7% (371) | 14.2% (13,235) |
| Less than High School | 10.2% (242) | 9.2% (8,540) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (458) | 18.3% (16,986) |
Education Levels Comparison: Garfield vs Redding
- In Redding, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Garfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Garfield hold a high school diploma at 15.7% compared to 14.2% in Redding.
- More residents in Garfield have less than a high school education at 10.2% compared to 9.2% in Redding.
- A higher percentage of residents in Garfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 18.3% in Redding.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.