Demographics details for Garfield, WA vs New windsor, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Garfield, WA vs New windsor, NY.

Data Garfield New windsor
Population 2,363 27,664
Median Age 49.9 years 41.0 years
Median Income $57,958 $80,000
Married Families 57.0% 62.1%
Poverty Level Data is updating Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.4 3.1

Population Comparison: Garfield vs New windsor

  • The population in New windsor is higher at 27,664, compared to 2,363 in Garfield.
  • Residents in Garfield have a higher median age of 49.9 years compared to 41.0 years in New windsor.
  • New windsor has a higher median income of $80,000, compared to $57,958 in Garfield.
  • In New windsor, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.1%, compared to 57.0% in Garfield.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Garfield and New windsor at 0%.
  • The unemployment rate in Garfield is higher at 4.4%, compared to 3.1% in New windsor.

Demographics

Demographics Garfield vs New windsor provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Garfield New windsor
Black 1 5
White 88 80
Asian 1 5
Hispanic 4 10
Two or More Races 6 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Garfield vs New windsor

  • In New windsor, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Garfield.
  • Garfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 80% in New windsor.
  • In New windsor, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Garfield.
  • New windsor has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 4% in Garfield.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Garfield at 6% compared to 0% in New windsor.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Garfield and New windsor at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Garfield New windsor
Mental Health Not Good 17.2% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 11.0% Data is updating%
Depression 28.7% Data is updating%
Smoking 14.6% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 18.2% Data is updating%
Obesity 40.3% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 23.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Garfield vs New windsor

  • More residents in Garfield report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 0.0% in New windsor.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Garfield at 28.7% compared to 0.0% in New windsor.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Garfield at 14.6% compared to 0.0% in New windsor.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Garfield at 18.2% compared to 0.0% in New windsor.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Garfield at 40.3% compared to 0.0% in New windsor.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Garfield at 23.0% compared to 0.0% in New windsor.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Garfield New windsor
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 15.7% (371) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 10.2% (242) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.4% (458) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Garfield vs New windsor

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Garfield and New windsor at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Garfield hold a high school diploma at 15.7% compared to 0.0% in New windsor.
  • More residents in Garfield have less than a high school education at 10.2% compared to 0.0% in New windsor.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Garfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 0.0% in New windsor.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.