Demographics details for Garfield, WA vs Lexington, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Garfield, WA vs Lexington, NC.
| Data | Garfield | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,363 | 19,679 |
| Median Age | 49.9 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $57,958 | $36,868 |
| Married Families | 57.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Garfield vs Lexington
- The population in Lexington is higher at 19,679, compared to 2,363 in Garfield.
- Residents in Garfield have a higher median age of 49.9 years compared to 38.6 years in Lexington.
- Garfield has a higher median income of $57,958 compared to $36,868 in Lexington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Garfield at 57.0% compared to 31.0% in Lexington.
- The poverty level is higher in Lexington at 15%, compared to 0% in Garfield.
- Lexington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.4% in Garfield.
Demographics
Demographics Garfield vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Garfield | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 31 |
| White | 88 | 38 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Garfield vs Lexington
- In Lexington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 31% compared to 1% in Garfield.
- Garfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 38% in Lexington.
- In Lexington, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Garfield.
- Lexington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 4% in Garfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lexington at 11%, compared to 6% in Garfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Garfield and Lexington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Garfield | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 15.5% |
| Depression | 28.7% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 24.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 40.3% | 42.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Garfield vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.2% in Garfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Garfield at 28.7% compared to 25.0% in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 14.6% in Garfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Garfield at 18.2% compared to 13.8% in Lexington.
- Lexington has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 40.3% in Garfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Garfield at 23.0% compared to 18.0% in Lexington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Garfield | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.7% (531) |
| High School Diploma | 15.7% (371) | 17.0% (3,355) |
| Less than High School | 10.2% (242) | 25.6% (5,036) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (458) | 10.2% (2,009) |
Education Levels Comparison: Garfield vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Garfield.
- In Lexington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 15.7% in Garfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lexington at 25.6%, compared to 10.2% in Garfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Garfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 10.2% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.