Demographics details for Gardner, MA vs Winfield, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gardner, MA vs Winfield, KS.
| Data | Gardner | Winfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,902 | 11,701 |
| Median Age | 45.0 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $56,974 | $55,850 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Gardner vs Winfield
- In Gardner, the population is higher at 20,902, compared to 11,701 in Winfield.
- Residents in Gardner have a higher median age of 45.0 years compared to 37.1 years in Winfield.
- Gardner has a higher median income of $56,974 compared to $55,850 in Winfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gardner at 38.0% compared to 34.0% in Winfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Winfield at 11%, compared to 9% in Gardner.
- The unemployment rate in Gardner is higher at 4.6%, compared to 3.5% in Winfield.
Demographics
Demographics Gardner vs Winfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gardner | Winfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 3 |
| White | 82 | 79 |
| Asian | 3 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gardner vs Winfield
- In Winfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Gardner.
- Gardner has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 79% in Winfield.
- In Winfield, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 3% in Gardner.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Gardner and Winfield at 8%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Winfield at 6%, compared to 5% in Gardner.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gardner and Winfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gardner | Winfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 11.2% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 22.4% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 20.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 33.5% | 40.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gardner vs Winfield
- More residents in Gardner report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 17.1% in Winfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gardner at 24.4% compared to 22.4% in Winfield.
- Winfield has a higher smoking rate at 20.5% compared to 17.3% in Gardner.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gardner at 17.6% compared to 17.4% in Winfield.
- Winfield has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 33.5% in Gardner.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Winfield at 19.0% compared to 14.0% in Gardner.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gardner | Winfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (276) | 1.5% (173) |
| High School Diploma | 21.5% (4,487) | 15.9% (1,856) |
| Less than High School | 16.8% (3,513) | 10.4% (1,217) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.0% (3,133) | 19.1% (2,232) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gardner vs Winfield
- In Winfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 1.3% in Gardner.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gardner hold a high school diploma at 21.5% compared to 15.9% in Winfield.
- More residents in Gardner have less than a high school education at 16.8% compared to 10.4% in Winfield.
- In Winfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.1% compared to 15.0% in Gardner.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.