Demographics details for Gardner, MA vs Waukegan, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gardner, MA vs Waukegan, IL.
Data | Gardner | Waukegan |
---|---|---|
Population | 20,902 | 87,976 |
Median Age | 45.0 years | 34.5 years |
Median Income | $56,974 | $66,077 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 6.4 |
Population Comparison: Gardner vs Waukegan
- The population in Waukegan is higher at 87,976, compared to 20,902 in Gardner.
- Residents in Gardner have a higher median age of 45.0 years compared to 34.5 years in Waukegan.
- Waukegan has a higher median income of $66,077, compared to $56,974 in Gardner.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gardner at 38.0% compared to 35.0% in Waukegan.
- The poverty level is higher in Waukegan at 14%, compared to 9% in Gardner.
- Waukegan has a higher unemployment rate at 6.4% compared to 4.6% in Gardner.
Demographics
Demographics Gardner vs Waukegan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Gardner | Waukegan |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 18 |
White | 82 | 2 |
Asian | 3 | 7 |
Hispanic | 8 | 54 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 18 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Gardner vs Waukegan
- In Waukegan, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 2% in Gardner.
- Gardner has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 2% in Waukegan.
- In Waukegan, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 3% in Gardner.
- Waukegan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 54%, compared to 8% in Gardner.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Waukegan at 18%, compared to 5% in Gardner.
- In Waukegan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Gardner.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Gardner | Waukegan |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 16.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 13.4% |
Depression | 24.4% | 17.9% |
Smoking | 17.3% | 18.0% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 15.2% |
Obesity | 33.5% | 39.3% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gardner vs Waukegan
- More residents in Gardner report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 16.6% in Waukegan.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gardner at 24.4% compared to 17.9% in Waukegan.
- Waukegan has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 17.3% in Gardner.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gardner at 17.6% compared to 15.2% in Waukegan.
- Waukegan has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 33.5% in Gardner.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gardner at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Waukegan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Gardner | Waukegan |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (276) | 3.1% (2,711) |
High School Diploma | 21.5% (4,487) | 16.5% (14,503) |
Less than High School | 16.8% (3,513) | 27.1% (23,842) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.0% (3,133) | 13.9% (12,220) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gardner vs Waukegan
- In Waukegan, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 1.3% in Gardner.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gardner hold a high school diploma at 21.5% compared to 16.5% in Waukegan.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Waukegan at 27.1%, compared to 16.8% in Gardner.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gardner hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.0% compared to 13.9% in Waukegan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.