Environment details: Gardner MA
acceptable quality; improvements can be made.
Environment details: Washington NC
Poor quality, needs upgrade.
Compare Environment: Gardner MA vs Washington NC
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
Metric | Gardner | Washington |
---|---|---|
CO2 Emissions | 449 | 925 |
Water Quality | 5/10 | 4/10 |
Water Quality Explanation | acceptable quality; improvements can be made. | Poor quality, needs upgrade. |
Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Average Air Quality Index | 1.74 | 1.64 |
Worst AQI | 5.0 | 3.0 |
Days with Poor AQI | 34 | 27 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Gardner vs Washington
- Water quality is rated higher in Gardner at 5/10 compared to 4/10 in Washington.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in Gardner with 1.74 compared to 1.64 in Washington.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Gardner at 34 compared to 27 in Washington.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.