Demographics details for Gardner, MA vs Vacaville, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Gardner, MA vs Vacaville, CA.

Data Gardner Vacaville
Population 20,902 101,918
Median Age 45.0 years 37.3 years
Median Income $56,974 $106,764
Married Families 38.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 9% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.6 4.6

Population Comparison: Gardner vs Vacaville

  • The population in Vacaville is higher at 101,918, compared to 20,902 in Gardner.
  • Residents in Gardner have a higher median age of 45.0 years compared to 37.3 years in Vacaville.
  • Vacaville has a higher median income of $106,764, compared to $56,974 in Gardner.
  • In Vacaville, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 38.0% in Gardner.
  • The poverty level is higher in Vacaville at 12%, compared to 9% in Gardner.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Gardner and Vacaville at 4.6%.

Demographics

Demographics Gardner vs Vacaville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Gardner Vacaville
Black 2 8
White 82 43
Asian 3 10
Hispanic 8 26
Two or More Races 5 12
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Gardner vs Vacaville

  • In Vacaville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 2% in Gardner.
  • Gardner has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 43% in Vacaville.
  • In Vacaville, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 3% in Gardner.
  • Vacaville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 26%, compared to 8% in Gardner.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Vacaville at 12%, compared to 5% in Gardner.
  • In Vacaville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Gardner.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Gardner Vacaville
Mental Health Not Good 18.7% 16.0%
Physical Health Not Good 11.1% 10.7%
Depression 24.4% 18.9%
Smoking 17.3% 12.5%
Binge Drinking 17.6% 17.9%
Obesity 33.5% 30.6%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Gardner vs Vacaville

  • More residents in Gardner report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 16.0% in Vacaville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Gardner at 24.4% compared to 18.9% in Vacaville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Gardner at 17.3% compared to 12.5% in Vacaville.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Vacaville at 17.9% compared to 17.6% in Gardner.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Gardner at 33.5% compared to 30.6% in Vacaville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Gardner at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Vacaville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Gardner Vacaville
No Schooling 1.3% (276) 0.8% (813)
High School Diploma 21.5% (4,487) 13.4% (13,656)
Less than High School 16.8% (3,513) 10.1% (10,246)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.0% (3,133) 18.1% (18,492)

Education Levels Comparison: Gardner vs Vacaville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Gardner have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.8% in Vacaville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Gardner hold a high school diploma at 21.5% compared to 13.4% in Vacaville.
  • More residents in Gardner have less than a high school education at 16.8% compared to 10.1% in Vacaville.
  • In Vacaville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.1% compared to 15.0% in Gardner.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.