Demographics details for Gardner, MA vs Sterling, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gardner, MA vs Sterling, OK.
| Data | Gardner | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,902 | 678 |
| Median Age | 45.0 years | 39.7 years |
| Median Income | $56,974 | $64,464 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Gardner vs Sterling
- In Gardner, the population is higher at 20,902, compared to 678 in Sterling.
- Residents in Gardner have a higher median age of 45.0 years compared to 39.7 years in Sterling.
- Sterling has a higher median income of $64,464, compared to $56,974 in Gardner.
- In Sterling, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 38.0% in Gardner.
- The poverty level is higher in Sterling at 12%, compared to 9% in Gardner.
- The unemployment rate in Gardner is higher at 4.6%, compared to 3.5% in Sterling.
Demographics
Demographics Gardner vs Sterling provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gardner | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 82 | 82 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gardner vs Sterling
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gardner at 2% compared to 0% in Sterling.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Gardner and Sterling at 82%.
- The Asian population is larger in Gardner at 3% compared to 1% in Sterling.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gardner at 8% compared to 6% in Sterling.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sterling at 11%, compared to 5% in Gardner.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gardner and Sterling at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gardner | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 28.2% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 20.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 33.5% | 42.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 40.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gardner vs Sterling
- More residents in Gardner report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 17.9% in Sterling.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sterling at 28.2% versus 24.4% in Gardner.
- Sterling has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 17.3% in Gardner.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gardner at 17.6% compared to 16.4% in Sterling.
- Sterling has higher obesity rates at 42.3% compared to 33.5% in Gardner.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sterling at 40.0% compared to 14.0% in Gardner.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gardner | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (276) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 21.5% (4,487) | 45.0% (305) |
| Less than High School | 16.8% (3,513) | 11.2% (76) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.0% (3,133) | 6.5% (44) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gardner vs Sterling
- A higher percentage of residents in Gardner have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- In Sterling, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 45.0% compared to 21.5% in Gardner.
- More residents in Gardner have less than a high school education at 16.8% compared to 11.2% in Sterling.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gardner hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.0% compared to 6.5% in Sterling.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.