Demographics details for Gardner, MA vs Sedona, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gardner, MA vs Sedona, AZ.
Data | Gardner | Sedona |
---|---|---|
Population | 20,902 | 9,790 |
Median Age | 45.0 years | 58.7 years |
Median Income | $56,974 | $62,901 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 51.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Gardner vs Sedona
- In Gardner, the population is higher at 20,902, compared to 9,790 in Sedona.
- The median age in Sedona is higher at 58.7 years, compared to 45.0 years in Gardner.
- Sedona has a higher median income of $62,901, compared to $56,974 in Gardner.
- In Sedona, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 38.0% in Gardner.
- The poverty level is higher in Sedona at 10%, compared to 9% in Gardner.
- The unemployment rate in Gardner is higher at 4.6%, compared to 3.3% in Sedona.
Demographics
Demographics Gardner vs Sedona provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Gardner | Sedona |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 1 |
White | 82 | 73 |
Asian | 3 | 3 |
Hispanic | 8 | 19 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gardner vs Sedona
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gardner at 2% compared to 1% in Sedona.
- Gardner has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 73% in Sedona.
- Both Gardner and Sedona have the same percentage of Asian residents at 3%.
- Sedona has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 8% in Gardner.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gardner at 5% compared to 4% in Sedona.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gardner and Sedona at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Gardner | Sedona |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 15.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 9.1% |
Depression | 24.4% | 19.7% |
Smoking | 17.3% | 12.0% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 17.3% |
Obesity | 33.5% | 24.5% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gardner vs Sedona
- More residents in Gardner report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 15.0% in Sedona.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gardner at 24.4% compared to 19.7% in Sedona.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gardner at 17.3% compared to 12.0% in Sedona.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gardner at 17.6% compared to 17.3% in Sedona.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gardner at 33.5% compared to 24.5% in Sedona.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gardner at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Sedona.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Gardner | Sedona |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (276) | 0.1% (6) |
High School Diploma | 21.5% (4,487) | 12.3% (1,206) |
Less than High School | 16.8% (3,513) | 8.4% (827) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.0% (3,133) | 44.7% (4,375) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gardner vs Sedona
- A higher percentage of residents in Gardner have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.1% in Sedona.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gardner hold a high school diploma at 21.5% compared to 12.3% in Sedona.
- More residents in Gardner have less than a high school education at 16.8% compared to 8.4% in Sedona.
- In Sedona, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.7% compared to 15.0% in Gardner.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.