Demographics details for Gardner, MA vs Sand springs, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gardner, MA vs Sand springs, OK.
Data | Gardner | Sand springs |
---|---|---|
Population | 20,902 | 20,031 |
Median Age | 45.0 years | 36.6 years |
Median Income | $56,974 | $70,431 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Gardner vs Sand springs
- In Gardner, the population is higher at 20,902, compared to 20,031 in Sand springs.
- Residents in Gardner have a higher median age of 45.0 years compared to 36.6 years in Sand springs.
- Sand springs has a higher median income of $70,431, compared to $56,974 in Gardner.
- In Sand springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 38.0% in Gardner.
- The poverty level is identical in both Gardner and Sand springs at 9%.
- The unemployment rate in Gardner is higher at 4.6%, compared to 3.8% in Sand springs.
Demographics
Demographics Gardner vs Sand springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Gardner | Sand springs |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 2 |
White | 82 | 76 |
Asian | 3 | 1 |
Hispanic | 8 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 7 |
Demographics Comparison: Gardner vs Sand springs
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Gardner and Sand springs at 2%.
- Gardner has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 76% in Sand springs.
- The Asian population is larger in Gardner at 3% compared to 1% in Sand springs.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gardner at 8% compared to 5% in Sand springs.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sand springs at 9%, compared to 5% in Gardner.
- In Sand springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 7%, compared to 0% in Gardner.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Gardner | Sand springs |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 18.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 11.8% |
Depression | 24.4% | 26.9% |
Smoking | 17.3% | 18.2% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 15.0% |
Obesity | 33.5% | 35.7% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gardner vs Sand springs
- More residents in Gardner report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 18.6% in Sand springs.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sand springs at 26.9% versus 24.4% in Gardner.
- Sand springs has a higher smoking rate at 18.2% compared to 17.3% in Gardner.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gardner at 17.6% compared to 15.0% in Sand springs.
- Sand springs has higher obesity rates at 35.7% compared to 33.5% in Gardner.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sand springs at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Gardner.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Gardner | Sand springs |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (276) | 0.5% (98) |
High School Diploma | 21.5% (4,487) | 16.8% (3,364) |
Less than High School | 16.8% (3,513) | 11.3% (2,260) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.0% (3,133) | 15.2% (3,042) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gardner vs Sand springs
- A higher percentage of residents in Gardner have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.5% in Sand springs.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gardner hold a high school diploma at 21.5% compared to 16.8% in Sand springs.
- More residents in Gardner have less than a high school education at 16.8% compared to 11.3% in Sand springs.
- In Sand springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.2% compared to 15.0% in Gardner.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.