Demographics details for Gardner, MA vs Flint hill, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gardner, MA vs Flint hill, VA.
| Data | Gardner | Flint hill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,902 | 319 |
| Median Age | 45.0 years | 28.0 years |
| Median Income | $56,974 | $39,044 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Gardner vs Flint hill
- In Gardner, the population is higher at 20,902, compared to 319 in Flint hill.
- Residents in Gardner have a higher median age of 45.0 years compared to 28.0 years in Flint hill.
- Gardner has a higher median income of $56,974 compared to $39,044 in Flint hill.
- In Flint hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 38.0% in Gardner.
- Gardner has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 4% in Flint hill.
- The unemployment rate in Gardner is higher at 4.6%, compared to 3.2% in Flint hill.
Demographics
Demographics Gardner vs Flint hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gardner | Flint hill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 82 | 67 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | 26 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gardner vs Flint hill
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gardner at 2% compared to 0% in Flint hill.
- Gardner has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 67% in Flint hill.
- The Asian population is larger in Gardner at 3% compared to 0% in Flint hill.
- Flint hill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 26%, compared to 8% in Gardner.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Flint hill at 7%, compared to 5% in Gardner.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gardner and Flint hill at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gardner | Flint hill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 16.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 18.5% |
| Obesity | 33.5% | 34.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gardner vs Flint hill
- More residents in Gardner report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 16.5% in Flint hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gardner at 24.4% compared to 24.0% in Flint hill.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gardner at 17.3% compared to 16.0% in Flint hill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Flint hill at 18.5% compared to 17.6% in Gardner.
- Flint hill has higher obesity rates at 34.4% compared to 33.5% in Gardner.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Flint hill at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Gardner.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gardner | Flint hill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (276) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 21.5% (4,487) | 20.1% (64) |
| Less than High School | 16.8% (3,513) | 28.2% (90) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.0% (3,133) | 15.7% (50) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gardner vs Flint hill
- A higher percentage of residents in Gardner have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Flint hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gardner hold a high school diploma at 21.5% compared to 20.1% in Flint hill.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Flint hill at 28.2%, compared to 16.8% in Gardner.
- In Flint hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 15.0% in Gardner.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.