Demographics details for Gardner, MA vs Dickinson, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gardner, MA vs Dickinson, TX.
Data | Gardner | Dickinson |
---|---|---|
Population | 20,902 | 21,738 |
Median Age | 45.0 years | 35.8 years |
Median Income | $56,974 | $81,739 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Gardner vs Dickinson
- The population in Dickinson is higher at 21,738, compared to 20,902 in Gardner.
- Residents in Gardner have a higher median age of 45.0 years compared to 35.8 years in Dickinson.
- Dickinson has a higher median income of $81,739, compared to $56,974 in Gardner.
- In Dickinson, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 38.0% in Gardner.
- The poverty level is identical in both Gardner and Dickinson at 9%.
- Dickinson has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 4.6% in Gardner.
Demographics
Demographics Gardner vs Dickinson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Gardner | Dickinson |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 7 |
White | 82 | 36 |
Asian | 3 | 1 |
Hispanic | 8 | 39 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 17 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gardner vs Dickinson
- In Dickinson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 2% in Gardner.
- Gardner has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 36% in Dickinson.
- The Asian population is larger in Gardner at 3% compared to 1% in Dickinson.
- Dickinson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 39%, compared to 8% in Gardner.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Dickinson at 17%, compared to 5% in Gardner.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gardner and Dickinson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Gardner | Dickinson |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 17.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 12.3% |
Depression | 24.4% | 22.7% |
Smoking | 17.3% | 17.2% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 33.5% | 36.5% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gardner vs Dickinson
- More residents in Gardner report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 17.2% in Dickinson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gardner at 24.4% compared to 22.7% in Dickinson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gardner at 17.3% compared to 17.2% in Dickinson.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Gardner and Dickinson at 17.6%.
- Dickinson has higher obesity rates at 36.5% compared to 33.5% in Gardner.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gardner at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Dickinson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Gardner | Dickinson |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (276) | 1.9% (403) |
High School Diploma | 21.5% (4,487) | 12.0% (2,607) |
Less than High School | 16.8% (3,513) | 18.9% (4,116) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.0% (3,133) | 15.8% (3,445) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gardner vs Dickinson
- In Dickinson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 1.3% in Gardner.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gardner hold a high school diploma at 21.5% compared to 12.0% in Dickinson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Dickinson at 18.9%, compared to 16.8% in Gardner.
- In Dickinson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.8% compared to 15.0% in Gardner.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.