Demographics details for Gardner, MA vs Cherokee, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gardner, MA vs Cherokee, OK.
| Data | Gardner | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,902 | 48,098 |
| Median Age | 45.0 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $56,974 | $52,410 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Gardner vs Cherokee
- The population in Cherokee is higher at 48,098, compared to 20,902 in Gardner.
- Residents in Gardner have a higher median age of 45.0 years compared to 36.5 years in Cherokee.
- Gardner has a higher median income of $56,974 compared to $52,410 in Cherokee.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Gardner and Cherokee at 38.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Cherokee at 15%, compared to 9% in Gardner.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Gardner and Cherokee at 4.6%.
Demographics
Demographics Gardner vs Cherokee provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gardner | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 82 | 42 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 33 |
Demographics Comparison: Gardner vs Cherokee
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gardner at 2% compared to 1% in Cherokee.
- Gardner has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 42% in Cherokee.
- The Asian population is larger in Gardner at 3% compared to 1% in Cherokee.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Gardner and Cherokee at 8%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cherokee at 15%, compared to 5% in Gardner.
- In Cherokee, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 33%, compared to 0% in Gardner.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gardner | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 26.6% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 23.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 33.5% | 43.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gardner vs Cherokee
- In Cherokee, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 18.7% in Gardner.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cherokee at 26.6% versus 24.4% in Gardner.
- Cherokee has a higher smoking rate at 23.2% compared to 17.3% in Gardner.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gardner at 17.6% compared to 13.8% in Cherokee.
- Cherokee has higher obesity rates at 43.7% compared to 33.5% in Gardner.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cherokee at 19.0% compared to 14.0% in Gardner.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gardner | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (276) | 0.9% (433) |
| High School Diploma | 21.5% (4,487) | 15.6% (7,526) |
| Less than High School | 16.8% (3,513) | 11.5% (5,552) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.0% (3,133) | 17.9% (8,612) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gardner vs Cherokee
- A higher percentage of residents in Gardner have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.9% in Cherokee.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gardner hold a high school diploma at 21.5% compared to 15.6% in Cherokee.
- More residents in Gardner have less than a high school education at 16.8% compared to 11.5% in Cherokee.
- In Cherokee, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.9% compared to 15.0% in Gardner.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.