Demographics details for Gardner, MA vs Bryant, SD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gardner, MA vs Bryant, SD.
| Data | Gardner | Bryant |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,902 | 473 |
| Median Age | 45.0 years | 22.8 years |
| Median Income | $56,974 | $58,558 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 56.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Gardner vs Bryant
- In Gardner, the population is higher at 20,902, compared to 473 in Bryant.
- Residents in Gardner have a higher median age of 45.0 years compared to 22.8 years in Bryant.
- Bryant has a higher median income of $58,558, compared to $56,974 in Gardner.
- In Bryant, the percentage of married families is higher at 56.0%, compared to 38.0% in Gardner.
- The poverty level is higher in Bryant at 10%, compared to 9% in Gardner.
- The unemployment rate in Gardner is higher at 4.6%, compared to 2.5% in Bryant.
Demographics
Demographics Gardner vs Bryant provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gardner | Bryant |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 82 | 89 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gardner vs Bryant
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gardner at 2% compared to 0% in Bryant.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bryant at 89% compared to 82% in Gardner.
- The Asian population is larger in Gardner at 3% compared to 0% in Bryant.
- Bryant has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 8% in Gardner.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gardner at 5% compared to 0% in Bryant.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gardner and Bryant at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gardner | Bryant |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 18.0% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 17.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 20.1% |
| Obesity | 33.5% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gardner vs Bryant
- More residents in Gardner report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 13.2% in Bryant.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gardner at 24.4% compared to 18.0% in Bryant.
- Bryant has a higher smoking rate at 17.5% compared to 17.3% in Gardner.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bryant at 20.1% compared to 17.6% in Gardner.
- Bryant has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 33.5% in Gardner.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gardner at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Bryant.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gardner | Bryant |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (276) | 3.4% (16) |
| High School Diploma | 21.5% (4,487) | 32.8% (155) |
| Less than High School | 16.8% (3,513) | 33.0% (156) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.0% (3,133) | 6.1% (29) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gardner vs Bryant
- In Bryant, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.4% compared to 1.3% in Gardner.
- In Bryant, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 32.8% compared to 21.5% in Gardner.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bryant at 33.0%, compared to 16.8% in Gardner.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gardner hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.0% compared to 6.1% in Bryant.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.