Demographics details for Gardner, MA vs Bixby, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gardner, MA vs Bixby, OK.
| Data | Gardner | Bixby |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,902 | 29,800 |
| Median Age | 45.0 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $56,974 | $93,765 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Gardner vs Bixby
- The population in Bixby is higher at 29,800, compared to 20,902 in Gardner.
- Residents in Gardner have a higher median age of 45.0 years compared to 36.8 years in Bixby.
- Bixby has a higher median income of $93,765, compared to $56,974 in Gardner.
- In Bixby, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 38.0% in Gardner.
- Gardner has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Bixby.
- The unemployment rate in Gardner is higher at 4.6%, compared to 3.3% in Bixby.
Demographics
Demographics Gardner vs Bixby provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gardner | Bixby |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 82 | 71 |
| Asian | 3 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 5 |
Demographics Comparison: Gardner vs Bixby
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Gardner and Bixby at 2%.
- Gardner has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 71% in Bixby.
- In Bixby, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 3% in Gardner.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gardner at 8% compared to 7% in Bixby.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bixby at 11%, compared to 5% in Gardner.
- In Bixby, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 0% in Gardner.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gardner | Bixby |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 12.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 15.7% |
| Obesity | 33.5% | 32.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gardner vs Bixby
- More residents in Gardner report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 15.8% in Bixby.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bixby at 24.5% versus 24.4% in Gardner.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gardner at 17.3% compared to 12.8% in Bixby.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gardner at 17.6% compared to 15.7% in Bixby.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gardner at 33.5% compared to 32.1% in Bixby.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gardner at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Bixby.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gardner | Bixby |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (276) | 0.5% (154) |
| High School Diploma | 21.5% (4,487) | 10.8% (3,233) |
| Less than High School | 16.8% (3,513) | 5.5% (1,652) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.0% (3,133) | 27.9% (8,313) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gardner vs Bixby
- A higher percentage of residents in Gardner have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.5% in Bixby.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gardner hold a high school diploma at 21.5% compared to 10.8% in Bixby.
- More residents in Gardner have less than a high school education at 16.8% compared to 5.5% in Bixby.
- In Bixby, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.9% compared to 15.0% in Gardner.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.