Demographics details for Gardena, CA vs Water valley, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Gardena, CA vs Water valley, MS.

Data Gardena Water valley
Population 58,843 3,361
Median Age 40.1 years 35.8 years
Median Income $75,443 $45,718
Married Families 37.0% 27.0%
Poverty Level 15% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 5.7 4.3

Population Comparison: Gardena vs Water valley

  • In Gardena, the population is higher at 58,843, compared to 3,361 in Water valley.
  • Residents in Gardena have a higher median age of 40.1 years compared to 35.8 years in Water valley.
  • Gardena has a higher median income of $75,443 compared to $45,718 in Water valley.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Gardena at 37.0% compared to 27.0% in Water valley.
  • Gardena has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Water valley.
  • The unemployment rate in Gardena is higher at 5.7%, compared to 4.3% in Water valley.

Demographics

Demographics Gardena vs Water valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Gardena Water valley
Black 20 49
White -5 49
Asian 25 Data is updating
Hispanic 44 2
Two or More Races 15 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Gardena vs Water valley

  • In Water valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 49% compared to 20% in Gardena.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Water valley at 49% compared to -5% in Gardena.
  • The Asian population is larger in Gardena at 25% compared to 0% in Water valley.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Gardena at 44% compared to 2% in Water valley.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Gardena at 15% compared to 0% in Water valley.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Gardena at 1% compared to 0% in Water valley.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Gardena Water valley
Mental Health Not Good 15.0% 18.2%
Physical Health Not Good 10.9% 13.8%
Depression 13.8% 22.0%
Smoking 11.3% 23.1%
Binge Drinking 13.5% 12.9%
Obesity 28.1% 44.0%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Gardena vs Water valley

  • In Water valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 15.0% in Gardena.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Water valley at 22.0% versus 13.8% in Gardena.
  • Water valley has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 11.3% in Gardena.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Gardena at 13.5% compared to 12.9% in Water valley.
  • Water valley has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 28.1% in Gardena.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Water valley at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Gardena.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Gardena Water valley
No Schooling 3.0% (1,776) 1.0% (34)
High School Diploma 15.0% (8,829) 24.0% (805)
Less than High School 26.5% (15,605) 13.0% (437)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.8% (11,669) 9.6% (322)

Education Levels Comparison: Gardena vs Water valley

  • A higher percentage of residents in Gardena have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.0% in Water valley.
  • In Water valley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.0% compared to 15.0% in Gardena.
  • More residents in Gardena have less than a high school education at 26.5% compared to 13.0% in Water valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Gardena hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.8% compared to 9.6% in Water valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.