Demographics details for Gardena, CA vs Mosheim, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gardena, CA vs Mosheim, TN.
Data | Gardena | Mosheim |
---|---|---|
Population | 58,843 | 2,508 |
Median Age | 40.1 years | 47.8 years |
Median Income | $75,443 | $45,294 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Gardena vs Mosheim
- In Gardena, the population is higher at 58,843, compared to 2,508 in Mosheim.
- The median age in Mosheim is higher at 47.8 years, compared to 40.1 years in Gardena.
- Gardena has a higher median income of $75,443 compared to $45,294 in Mosheim.
- In Mosheim, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 37.0% in Gardena.
- Gardena has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Mosheim.
- The unemployment rate in Gardena is higher at 5.7%, compared to 4.3% in Mosheim.
Demographics
Demographics Gardena vs Mosheim provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Gardena | Mosheim |
---|---|---|
Black | 20 | Data is updating |
White | -5 | 97 |
Asian | 25 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 44 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 15 | 2 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gardena vs Mosheim
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gardena at 20% compared to 0% in Mosheim.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mosheim at 97% compared to -5% in Gardena.
- The Asian population is larger in Gardena at 25% compared to 0% in Mosheim.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gardena at 44% compared to 1% in Mosheim.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gardena at 15% compared to 2% in Mosheim.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Gardena at 1% compared to 0% in Mosheim.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Gardena | Mosheim |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 20.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 14.3% |
Depression | 13.8% | 29.7% |
Smoking | 11.3% | 25.1% |
Binge Drinking | 13.5% | 15.7% |
Obesity | 28.1% | 36.9% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 39.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gardena vs Mosheim
- In Mosheim, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 15.0% in Gardena.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mosheim at 29.7% versus 13.8% in Gardena.
- Mosheim has a higher smoking rate at 25.1% compared to 11.3% in Gardena.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mosheim at 15.7% compared to 13.5% in Gardena.
- Mosheim has higher obesity rates at 36.9% compared to 28.1% in Gardena.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mosheim at 39.0% compared to 12.0% in Gardena.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Gardena | Mosheim |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.0% (1,776) | 0.2% (5) |
High School Diploma | 15.0% (8,829) | 32.3% (811) |
Less than High School | 26.5% (15,605) | 33.3% (836) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.8% (11,669) | 7.1% (179) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gardena vs Mosheim
- A higher percentage of residents in Gardena have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.2% in Mosheim.
- In Mosheim, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 32.3% compared to 15.0% in Gardena.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mosheim at 33.3%, compared to 26.5% in Gardena.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gardena hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.8% compared to 7.1% in Mosheim.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.