Demographics details for Gardena, CA vs Lugoff, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gardena, CA vs Lugoff, SC.
| Data | Gardena | Lugoff |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 58,843 | 9,423 |
| Median Age | 40.1 years | 39.4 years |
| Median Income | $75,443 | $57,885 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Gardena vs Lugoff
- In Gardena, the population is higher at 58,843, compared to 9,423 in Lugoff.
- Residents in Gardena have a higher median age of 40.1 years compared to 39.4 years in Lugoff.
- Gardena has a higher median income of $75,443 compared to $57,885 in Lugoff.
- In Lugoff, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 37.0% in Gardena.
- Gardena has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 9% in Lugoff.
- The unemployment rate in Gardena is higher at 5.7%, compared to 5.3% in Lugoff.
Demographics
Demographics Gardena vs Lugoff provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gardena | Lugoff |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 20 | 21 |
| White | -5 | 73 |
| Asian | 25 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 44 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gardena vs Lugoff
- In Lugoff, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 20% in Gardena.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lugoff at 73% compared to -5% in Gardena.
- The Asian population is larger in Gardena at 25% compared to 0% in Lugoff.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gardena at 44% compared to 3% in Lugoff.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gardena at 15% compared to 3% in Lugoff.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Gardena at 1% compared to 0% in Lugoff.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gardena | Lugoff |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 13.8% | 22.5% |
| Smoking | 11.3% | 17.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.5% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 28.1% | 34.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gardena vs Lugoff
- In Lugoff, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 15.0% in Gardena.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lugoff at 22.5% versus 13.8% in Gardena.
- Lugoff has a higher smoking rate at 17.4% compared to 11.3% in Gardena.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lugoff at 16.7% compared to 13.5% in Gardena.
- Lugoff has higher obesity rates at 34.1% compared to 28.1% in Gardena.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lugoff at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Gardena.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gardena | Lugoff |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.0% (1,776) | 0.9% (83) |
| High School Diploma | 15.0% (8,829) | 19.6% (1,843) |
| Less than High School | 26.5% (15,605) | 8.3% (778) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.8% (11,669) | 16.3% (1,537) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gardena vs Lugoff
- A higher percentage of residents in Gardena have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.9% in Lugoff.
- In Lugoff, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.6% compared to 15.0% in Gardena.
- More residents in Gardena have less than a high school education at 26.5% compared to 8.3% in Lugoff.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gardena hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.8% compared to 16.3% in Lugoff.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.